• Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    What is this supposed to do exactly? Hurt only the senators that aren’t independently wealthy / doing insider trading?

    We’re supposed to pretend most of them are there for the paycheck and not the power?

  • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I would rather a government shutdown result in a near immediate general election for every single senator, representative, and the president and vice president, but that would require a whole extra constitutional amendment and this fine for what is realistic.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It sounds good, but ends up hurting only the senators who aren’t filthy rich.

    Doing a Papal conclave would force them to come to a fair agreement because the ones taking bribes would have to suffer too.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That‘s going to be younger democrats. They‘re more likely to be independent women or minorities that probably won‘t have the money or financial backing the typical white male republican will have.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, capitalism has wholly captured and groomed the worst of the political class to the state and federal level, and everyone’s still acting like the average politician is just some ineffective idealist, instead of a white collar criminal positioned because they were corrupt.

        It’s like how people still default to “won’t someone think of the small businesses and competition” when regulations are mentioned. Everyone still acts like it’s the 50’s and we still have mom & pop style small businesses, when capitalism has already destroyed the lions share of small or family owned businesses, and achieved a functional-monopoly in every major industry.

        The last century of corporate propaganda was a roaring success.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If we did this for everything, it would also be a defecto requirement to be fairly young.

      Of course limiting our repsentation to only the able bodied is inherently undemocratic, but goddamn I am tired of these octogenarians deciding policy they don’t understand or have to live with.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And is this shit supposed to make them look good all of a sudden? We’re going to just forgive and forget the treason they commit/allow to happen on a daily basis?

    No, I dont think so. Bunch of cockgobblers, riding a demented old fuck to hell and dragging all of the rest of us down with them. I bet the sycophants on Fox are praising them like mad too.

  • imahappyguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Gentle reminder that the US pays ~$100M/yr to their congresspersons. What an insane waste of money.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I mean between the House and the Senate you’re looking at upwards of 500 people, or ~$200k per person per year. That’s senior software developer money, which if anything is too low for the highest authority of the current global hegemon.