The president added that he has “instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas.”

  • 2piradians@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Fuck sake, now he’s threatening third-party vessels with his malevolent idiocy. This is a big misstep of an escalation, no?

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is a big misstep of an escalation, no?

      Always has been

      In all seriousness, is he expecting the US Navy to fire on civilian vessels? I’d bet we’re nearing a point of mutiny on some ships

      • pno2nr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think there can be 30 hour laundry fires on a US Navy vessel without at least a little bit of mutiny.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d bet we’re nearing a point of mutiny on some ships

        I’ll take that bet

      • disorderly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s the sort of move that might look like a clever reversal, but ultimately has a very steep price tag.

        A blockade is an act of war, and this one is clearly pointed at the rest of the world, not Iran. It’s predicated on the same faulty assumption that Trump’s administration made when invading Iran: our military is unanswerable, and they will take it lying down.

        Escalation paths from this are all bad-- what if an EU ship ignores challenges from a US Navy vessel, or China sends a military escort with a shipping fleet? Are we really about to start another shooting war, or will we stand there with our dicks in our hands as they sail by?

        I’m thinking this brilliant idea is abandoned in a week.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m thinking this brilliant idea is abandoned in a week.

          I wish I share your confidence.

        • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          If they were even somewhat smart, they’d be blocking just Iranian shipping.

          Still less dumb and less war crimes than bombing civilian infrastructure

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            If they were even somewhat smart, we wouldn’t be there and isntreal would be cut off from all trade globally or states doing businesses with them would be sanctioned, like USA is doing with Cuba.

      • 2piradians@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        9 hours ago

        How is it smart? Honest question, because it strikes me as pissing off the countries that charter those ships as well as the oil companies (boo hoo, but they have pull with all their money).

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That doesn’t make any logical sense…

        The only “smart play” is fucking off and leaving Israel to deal with the chaos alone.

        Which is the inevitable next step the evangelical extremists will want with Israel. They’re trying to bring about Armageddon and the last step in their myth is for all of Israels neighbors to unite and wipe them off the map.

        They want Armageddon in their lifetimes, their support of Israel has always had a baked in end date. Because Israel getting destroyed is required before they think they’ll be raptured.

        • officermike@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          If Israel becomes a smoking crater and there’s no rapture, will the evangelicals finally come to the realization they’ve been living in a fairy tale?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            trump already has a weird insistince they all wear the same shoes…

            I’m just saying, there’s a very real chance if they’re not “called to heaven” that they take the initiative to ringing the doorbell on a mass scale.

            Like, I don’t know how far you’ve looked into their rabbit hole, but there’s lots of wriggle room around “suicides don’t go to heaven”. Something like going 150 on the interstate and letting go of the wheel could easily be rationalized as “this was always God’s plan”. Or just some version of Russian roulette, any random chance can be seen as God’s hand.

            This isn’t the first time a doomsday prophecy falls thru, it’s gonna go like it always does.

            • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              This isn’t the first time a doomsday prophecy falls thru, it’s gonna go like it always does.

              Yeah but I feel like the scale of this one might be a smidge bigger than the others. Combined.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Only because you’re living thru this one, which is the same logical fallacy as when 2,000 years of Christians have all been convinced Jesus is coming back in their lifetime, and so will the next 2,000 years of Christians.

                Shit that’s happening around us currently always seem like a bigger deal, because to us it is, because it’s happening to us right now.

                Zoom out and start thinking as “humanity” and not “I” and none of this shit is really that new.

        • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Question is, if you’re Ronald McDonald and simply pull out, and Iran keeps asking for a toll, you just get a pure loss. A blockade is the only way, that maybe, you can improve your negotiating position for “cheap”. It will backfire for sure though

          Obviously the smart play was not to invade at all

          • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            There is another smart play.

            Give Iran something it wants that actually benefits Americans.

            You might think there isn’t anything but there is one:

            Stop supporting Israel fully.

            But they won’t cause the Epstein class is either compromised or in on it.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Second smartest is GTFO but as was reminded me elsewhere, big, fat, unhealthy ID running the ego can’t countenance that.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            A blockade is the only way, that maybe, you can improve your negotiating position for “cheap”

            Negotiating position for…

            What?

            Everything trump wants, he already had.

            What he wants now is the strait to be open, it’s only closed because they’re attacking Iran. If they stopped attacking Iran and fucked off, why would Iran keep blocking the strait?

            No one, especially Iran, want the strait blocked. Iran is blocking it because that’s their leverage to get the war to stop

            If trump blocks the fucking strait, what do you think his condition is? You think he’s gonna demand Iran that they stop being attacked? Iran already wants to stop having war crimes committed against them, they can’t want to stop the war crimes anymore.

            Where the actual fuck are you getting any of your information on about this conflict?

            • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Try to think like the great dumbass for a minute:

              Iran has said they want to keep the toll system in place after the war

              Therefore if you just leave now, everyone will be very mad at you at toll

              Therefore only way out is escalating. An invasion is expensive, unpopular, and unlikely to work. They’re already bombing Iran, so not that.

              What remains is a naval blockade. Because they’re dumbasses, they didn’t just decide to block Iranian shipping, but instead essentially block all remaining shipping.

              It’s less dumb than other options, and less war crimes and killing civilians

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                I’d say it’s the only somewhat smart play he has left

                That’s what you said, that is false.

                I’m worried you’ve rambled on for so long you’ve forgotten what you’re even trying to defend

                • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  When I said somewhat smart the emphasis was on somewhat, and I meant, the least dumb option that he was likely to take (am not counting just exiting, cause he is who he is)