I never understood this, maybe they just need the money that badly or are outright threatened.

Why would you believe they would give you money once you’re out of their country. You are no longer their problem.

To retain ownership across state lines where the property is considered a limited person in the other state.

But that wouldn’t work for say heroin.

If your state says heroin is legal and the fed says it’s illegal, you can’t really leave your state and still legally be in possession of it.

I guess you could claim you own a person in a red state but once they leave, you no longer own them?

Wasn’t that the red states’ whole complaint? That their slaves shouldn’t be considered free men once they leave?

So in conclusion, the whole states rights argument doesn’t work because what they actually wanted was to have their state’s laws apply across the country.

And this doesn’t even talk about the moral issues which imo and most people’s opinion should override the above logic anyway.

Was there ever a time that Republicans actually stayed true to their principles when it wasn’t to their advantage?

In my life experience I honestly can’t think of a time.

Anyone got a map handy of cost of living per major city or country?

Edit: I found this: https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/region_rankings.jsp?region=150&title=2025

Wasn’t there a comic with trump resorts being built in Gaza like 6 months ago, I thought it was common knowledge even then

What if it’s already 0?

How so? It’s only 10 increments

How about

x=x-x

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

x++

Still feels like a flex

Huh, for some reason I imagined her to be smaller.

Thanks for the share!

So if we were all clones? There is an ant mega colony that is doing that

Hot take: he isn’t good but would have been better than Biden during that debate

The only thing I got from that article is that the author clearly likes cats

Also hand in hand with fake it till you make it.

The whole industry wants to pretend it’s good enough cause it will eventually get better (ML will, LLMs won’t).

Cause we are facing global economic hardship, which is partially due to climate change.

This is the sad part, most people’s priority is their standard of living so when economic hardship happens, they double down on short term thinking.

This is why climate action needs to go hand in hand with economic reform so most people’s life gets better as we go towards solar punk.

In theory the rich who have horded all that wealth could benefit humanity if that wealth becomes our piggy bank to fix things.

You know, if he was full of regret on his death bed that would be something, but the only thing I remember from him is him supporting Kamala, no comment on regrets.

I mean, it’s really simple, if they hate socialism so much, all they have to do is make life a little better for regular folks.

That’s the thing though, it’s either rich get richer for them or it’s hell.

Would republicans support taxing wealth if it’s the “right ethic group”

Germany totally “taxed” wealthy Jews at some point.

Well tariffs are prices you charge the buyer when you move goods.

Doesn’t that mean Texans buying New Yorkers would pay a premium on owning humans?

I know they didn’t mean slavery, but it’s far more logical than what he thinks he is saying. And Texas was part of the confederacy sooo…

Yes but not with intent, it just does that because line goes up and it’s made to make line go up