President Donald Trump has warned the U.K. and France that the “U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore,” as he vented his frustration over the close allies’ refusal to join military action against Iran.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The word “allies” means people who work together for a common goal. When Trump made up his own goals (e.g., tariffs, wars), he got rid of those. So there’s nothing to ally around.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They never were. We were there for them though. There’s only one NATO country who used NATO article 5 “an attack against one is an attack against all”: the US after 9/11. And the rest came to their aid.

    • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Really? Let’s check that:

      The decision to invoke NATO’s collective self-defense provisions was undertaken at NATO’s own initiative, without a request by the United States, and occurred despite the hesitation of Germany, Belgium, Norway, and the Netherlands.

      Two small military operations were ultimately authorized under the terms of the resolutions: Operation Eagle Assist, consisting of the deployment of several aircraft to North America; and, Operation Active Endeavour, a mostly symbolic naval deployment in the Mediterranean Sea. The United States, which was skeptical of NATO capabilities, elected not to seek further Article 5 support and the alliance did not participate in the ensuing American invasion of Afghanistan, though some individual members did make contributions outside of the NATO command structure.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is the US not there or is Trump not there? He’s pretty old and not that healthy. Sooner or later someone more pragmatic will be in the chair.

  • Tarambor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They never were. For decades the US has only been in NATO for it’s own enrichment and it’s own defence. The ballistic early warning radar that the US have in the UK aren’t of any use to us, flight times from Russia are so short that we’d not be able to react. But they do give the US a significant amount of time to be warned of inbound nukes and to do something about it for them.

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I thought America had the greatest army in the world and didn’t want out help anyway

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      When has America actually helped anyone since WW2? Korea? Kuwait? Everything else was dubious, at best; often crimes against humanity levels of imperialism, corruption, and war crimes.

      Most of the cold war was so tense and dangerous because they considered everything other than capitalism — regardless of any populations democratic will and self-determination — an existential threat that warrants warfare and mass murder.

      • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think the cold war was less about ideology about economic systems and more about alignment with the Soviet Union.

        There was plenty of eurocommunism and social democracy in Europe that wasn’t commented on by the US. Relations with the PRC were normalized in the 1970s after the 1961 sino-soviet split.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yeah and the war is already over but they need help with the current main objective of the war opening the straits to pedophile run countries that was open before the war started if I’m tracking things right

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Pete’s Warriors just need a little bit of help. Warriors ask for help don’t they?

      • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        then THAT “whoever” is a fool. A world war is pretty much the end of the gravy train. They’re dumb if they think they will come out on top.

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You seem pretty confident in that despite the fact that large scale wars have made the current players in this war rich and powerful in the first place.

          Look at the outcomes of WWII. The US and Russia emerge as superpowers. Hell, it’s the only reason Israel even exists.

          Wars exist because they benefit the ruling class.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Look at the outcomes of WWII. The US and Russia emerge as superpowers.

            The US and Russia emerged as superpowers because 99% of the fighting wasn’t on their land. They didn’t have to rebuild.

              • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Why? Because you think there’s enough difference between the USSR and Russia to differentiate between them? The only major difference is that half the continent is no longer under Russian rule. Russia is USSR light. Same shit different day, regardless of what they want to claim about communism/capitalism/oligarchs/etc. It’s the rich fucks running everything and killing or “disappearing” anyone critical of the regime.

          • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You seem pretty confident in that

            if you ask me to gamble on starting of a nuclear war vs. it not happening… I wouldn’t risk it.

            Look at the outcomes of WWII

            I did look at the outcomes. It was quite a different set of circumstances.

            1. Most of the world did not have Nuclear Missiles.
            2. We didn’t have Social Media to the extent to allow a small group of people to spread FUD so easily.
            3. We didn’t have global mega-corps manipulating the fabric of society with impunity. The average CEO is out of touch with workers and only thinks ahead 3 months. There is a lot of arrogance and ignorance about concepts beyond one’s understanding.
            4. Making Money/Having Clout is the only metric of success.
            5. Human induced climate change is messing with the ecological system and making it difficult to rely on crops. It will hit hard especially when we are not paying attention due to pointless wars.
            6. There is a fucking betting market for if a child gets bombed to bits in some part of the world, and a pedophile and his cabinet seem to be doing insider trading on it.
            7. Every fucker is a racist or facist or adjacent. Empathy has taken a permanent sabbatical.

            Wars exist to benefit the ruling class. But if all of the ruling class dies it’s fucking stupid.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Hell, it’s the only reason Israel even exists.

            This is an understandably common view, but it’s not true. The only fundamental change WWII brought to Palestine was weakening the British Empire; Zionists, partially due to British support, were by far the ascendant group in Palestine as early as 1939, so Israel was going to appear as soon as the British left Palestine. Zionist wealth and diplomacy, Arab weakness and division, Western colonial ambitions and British colonial policy made something resembling the current situation inevitable with or without WWII.

            • John Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Does anyone remember when Zionists bombed a ship full of Jewish refugees in 1940 (SS Patria Disaster) and Palestinians helped save victims from the water and then many were forced out of their homes 8 years later by Zionists?

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You need to understand that there is a real faction within the already heinous Nationalist Christians that are even more truly batshit insane than their already crazy baseline, who are genuinely doing their level best to bring about the biblical end times - which, of course just means a nuclear holocaust for everyone. This is not hyperbole. There are people who are actually pushing for that outcome who are part of our regime right now.

          • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That’s utterly delusional. And it’s a shame on sane people like me who allowed such morons to change the destiny of the world.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The moment anyone else moves to assist he will simply bail out and walk away. He was actually dumb enough to say that out loud too. It would be strategically stupid and politically suicidal for anyone else to get involved.