silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 days agoUS Planning First New Coal Power Plant Since 2013, in Alaskawww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down14
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkUS Planning First New Coal Power Plant Since 2013, in Alaskawww.bloomberg.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 days agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareSteve@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·4 days agoNo nuke is a political problem. And it would provide much extra heat too
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 days agoMore than they could use? It’s completely unviable for the foreseeable future. It’s cost would simply not be recouped. I’m all for building nuclear power plants. …where it makes economic sense to do so. This would make no sense.
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoNuclear power plants have never broken even without massive subsidies.
minus-squareBrkdncr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·4 days agoDude, Alaska has issues we don’t have.
No nuke is a political problem.
And it would provide much extra heat too
More than they could use? It’s completely unviable for the foreseeable future. It’s cost would simply not be recouped.
I’m all for building nuclear power plants. …where it makes economic sense to do so. This would make no sense.
Nuclear power plants have never broken even without massive subsidies.
Dude, Alaska has issues we don’t have.