• RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “There’s no evidence this longtime Epstein associate who flew multiple times on a plane called the Lolita Express did anything inappropriate with kids”

    • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well?

      You’re implying that there is.

      So where is it? You’re setting expectations extremely high for yourself.

      Gonna need that evidence.

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        You know things are going well for your wealthy rapist of choice when you’re reduced to saying “Well can you prove that he was doing the things that everyone around him was also doing?”

    • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Correct. Epstein had connections to his charities. Was for humanitarian work.

      You think Trump released the files with more evidence of him fucking kids than Clinton if there was any other option?

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yeah man the president of the united states totally needed the funding and connections of a known pedophile in order to do some vague, nondescript “social work”.

        • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          He didn’t need to, but he was not a known pedophile, and the travel was tied publicly tied to Clinton foundation work like the 2002 Africa trip for HIV/AIDS.

          Again, you think Trump hid evidence of Clinton’s wrongdoings but published damning things on himself?

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Trump is trying to drop the Epstein files entirely, if anyone involved is implicated then everyone involved is implicated, as it establishes the validity of guilt among those involved with Epstein, that’s why literally no one other than Maxwell has done any time for any of this fucked up nonsense, and they’re actively trying to undo any of her punishment with far more fervor than they’re putting into investigating anything else in the files. If he goes after Clinton then that would establish that there is reason to properly investigate and prosecute others in the files, and nobody is in the files more than Trump. He doesn’t want anyone to go down for any of it, because that would be painting a target on himself by way of legal precedence. It’s all just an act of self preservation by the system of pedophiles running the country from top to bottom, if one goes down then they could all go down.

            • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              riiight…but they contain plenty of incriminating information about Trump. Where’s the incriminating information about Clinton?

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                In the files. I’m not going to read them for you. Wipe your own ass. I’m not saying they blatantly say “Bill Clinton rapes children” but there is far more than enough in there to justify an investigation, at the very least. Taking a private flight on the violent child rape traffic plane to party on violent child rape island with the world’s most prolific violent child rapist and violent child rape trafficker is, and this might just be me, a little bit suspicious.

                • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I have read them check my post history.

                  If you had read them and there was anything incriminating like there is for Trump you would’ve said that instead of repeating the flying on his plane thing again.

                  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    Sure. A stranger on the internet not going through six million pages of evidence to build a court case with absolute proof against a politician for another stranger on the internet definitely means I haven’t looked into anything, couldn’t possibly be that I really don’t give a shit to try to change the perspective of someone via a forum argument, it also definitely means Clinton never did anything wrong while repeatedly interacting with people and places where children were raped and murdered to the point that there was a joke portrait of him hanging on the wall. No reason to look into that.