• Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So this makes me think. Did they attack Venezuela first to get access to the oil there and prevent a price spike from happening when they attacked Iran? Or am I giving the current regime too much credit?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      venezeuala oil seems very expensive to extract, we havnt heard of venezuela for like 1-2 months already, meaning trump likely has abandoned the country already.

    • JollyG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Considering that representatives from the Trump cabinet appeared to be surprised that Iran can and did block the strait of Hormuz, I’d say you are giving too much credit.

      Also, the US is a net exporter of oil. National supply concerns aren’t the issue so much as global supply shock. Restrictions anywhere lead to price hikes.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Reminder that literally not one single major oil company wanted to be involved in Trump’s plans to exploit Venezuelan oil - with the exception of the one company already there, who basically suggested they might make some very, very small expansions to their operations - because all of them thought it was an idiotic idea.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        trumps purpose in venezuela was justa distraction , just like the attack on iran. hes like the person that chases the next new shiny gold item that comes along.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Same is true of us oil. If you want conspiracy theories, there’s a more straightforward one. Us oil tends to be expensive with the need for advanced drilling such as fracking and horizontal drilling. In order to make a profit, it has to sell at like $60/bbl or more. Raising the global price of oil helps enrich those oligarchs that funded drumps csmpaign

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        It’s doubtful if most of the reserves can become viable at any price. (Because the cost of materials increase when oil price increase.) But some are perfectly viable.

        But also, even in perfect conditions, if they started drilling right now (what they aren’t), it will take several month to start getting any of it.

      • Kirp123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Well if the price goes up then it becomes feasible to extract it. Same with the oil the US has at home. They could also extract it if the price gets too high, the reason they aren’t doing so now is because the Middle East oil is cheaper (well, WAS cheaper).

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Venezuelan oil production fell off a cliff starting around 2015 and has only recovered to a third of what it was then. It will take years to build industry there back up, so it won’t do much right now. However, once it is built back up, it will be a major exporter again.