Even as administration officials vowed this week to head off scheduled retirements, some aging plants are now breaking, and costs could run to the billions.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Is the obsession they have with coal just that they heard pollution from coal burning predominantly affects the poor?

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      They want votes from coal miners. But from what I’ve heard anyone in the industry says it’s terrible. And lobbying of course.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think it’s more than anything part of the approach to fill the playing field with as much chaos as possible while you steal everything you can get your corrupt hands on, but it could be more than that I suppose.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t think bribes actually factor in here; nobody but them wants the coal to continue. There’s already more profitable replacements for those who would bribe them.

        I think it’s more a reactionary thing — progressives want to eliminate coal, and so that must be prevented at all costs. Which ties into the historical culture thing.