• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Imperialism has changed quite a bit from Lenin, such as the current development of one large empire and several vassal states under it benefitting from imperialism. Lenin’s work is actually best translated as “current highest,” not “highest.” Economists like Cheng Enfu have developed theories of Neoimperialism, and Nkrumah with Neocolonialism.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I second this. I enjoyed reading Lenin’s Imperialism very much, but it also felt very dated (as it should, it’s well over 100 years old now). I can’t help but think that if Lenin were alive today, he’d agree. That doesn’t mean it’s not an incredibly important work that we can’t draw from today, but we should also understand how the world has changed since.

      I haven’t read John Smith’s Imperialism in the 21st Century yet, but I’ve heard it’s a very good update.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        While I understand that it’s statistically likely, I can’t believe some people are actually named “John Smith” lol.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, Marxist-Leninists have been advancing our theory beyond Lenin. What Lenin laid out is still foundational for analyzing the imperialism of today, but we are no longer in the age of competing empires, but a dying mega-empire and the rise of the global south.