In her new book, Kamala Harris insists she only lost the election because she didn’t have enough time. But she accidentally demonstrates the real reason: she’s a terrible politician.
  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
    52·
    23 hours ago

    Harris adviser says VP ran ‘flawless’ campaign

    “I would posit she ran a pretty flawless campaign, and she did all the steps that [were] required to be successful,” she added. “And I think – obviously, we did not win, but I do think we hit all the marks.”

    …

    Nix, Harris’ campaign manager, also attributed Trump’s decision not to participate in any debate following the ABC News presidential debate on Sept. 10 as detrimental to the Harris campaign’s strategy of presenting the choice between Trump and Harris clearly to voters several times.

    “I think that was hard for us to then get the attention that we would have liked to,” Nix said.

    Well, there you have it. Perfect campaign. No notes. Just wish Trump had been willing to debate, because we all know the problem Harris had was getting her face out there.

        • saimen@feddit.org
          14·
          8 hours ago

          So this is why you supported Trump (by not voting against him)? Wouldn’t it still be so much better than what you have now?

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            4·
            5 hours ago

            Votes aren’t wishes. The electoral college is a thing. Many states are locked down for one side or the other and it really doesn’t matter who any individual votes for. In fact, being from Connecticut, I’ve voted for a third party for decades because I feel like it’s the only way for my vote for president to potentially have an impact. Unless you know this person lives in a swing state you’re being really ignorant by throwing out those kinds of accusations.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      101·
      22 hours ago

      If only our opponent hadn’t made a choice detrimental to us!