Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer offered a new plan to Republicans that would allow the U.S. government to reopen after a shutdown that began on Oct. 1.

But Republicans quickly dismissed Schumer’s proposal, which hinges on protecting enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies for at least one year.

Schumer’s proposal calls for Democrats to agree to pass a so-called clean resolution that would provide short-term funding for government operations.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is actually better. What they offered was a common sense path forward on the issue of the healthcare subsidies. Continue to fund them for a year, and in the meantime form a congressional committee to find options for how to proceed beyond that.

      Republicans turning this down just places the blame for continuing the shutdown, firmly in their laps. At this point any talk of this still being the Democrats fault, is beyond ridiculous. They’re actually negotiating, while Republicans are simply refusing to even try.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Exactly! I’ll repeat what I wrote elsewhere that this is actually a good strategic move as much as I want Jeffries and Schumer gone.

        Follow me:

        • The GOP are forking Democrats to choose a loss of SNAP benefits, or a loss of healthcare tax subsidies that will see premiums skyrocket to unaffordable levels for millions.

        • Democrats DO have the negotiating leverage right now considering Trump’s approval is plummeting and more Americans blame Republicans than Democrats.

        • However, this move has a slightly veiled one: It punts the issue to become a talking-point on healthcare right around midterms next year, which will be hugely beneficial to Democratic talking points.

        • As a result, Democrats seize a win for the American people in both restoring SNAP benefits and ACA tax subsidies for a year more, while at the same time loading up political leverage for midterms next year.

        • NOT TO MENTION: It solidifies the side who is trying to viably come to the table and to HELP the American people. Makes them look like the adults in the room.

        Dare I say, great move.

        • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Exactly. The only way they could fuck this up, is to cave. That would be the definition of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

          Let’s hope they don’t…because honestly, I do not have a lot of faith in their ability to hold the line.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think the offer was fine, especially since it was rejected. Shows goodwill negotiation that independents say they like, doesn’t cost anything

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Because you cant admit you’re wrong, I can’t?

          I would be delighted to be wrong. And you’re fooling yourself if you think Schumer is up for a fight.

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What was I wrong about?

            No, you won’t admit it. You’ll continue to oppose Schumer at all times and in all circumstances even when he does the thing you say you want him to do.