• Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Why not? The fuck Ronnie Reagan, an actor, made it into office. Like many have indicated below Zelensky is another good example. If Stewart runs, who should be his running mate. I would choose AOC.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not a requirement. It’s a political strategy. If the candidate is from a “liberal elite” coastal state, then the running mate has to be from flyover country. It’s pandering.

        • AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Read the 12th Amendment. That being said, one of the two could easily pull a “Cheney maneuver” and buy a house in a different state. Problem solved.

          • absentbird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They already live in different states; New York for AOC, New Jersey for John Stewart. They both start with ‘New’, but they are not the same state.

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Seems like the 12th amendment says that EC electors cannot cast a vote for two people from their state.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        They can both be from the same state and electors from all the other states except their own can vote for both of them if they win that state (Potus and VP are actually voted on as separate votes). BUT electors from their own state could only cast their votes for one of them!

        Per the 12th Amendment:

        The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves

        Just another stupid thing about the Electoral College system. Say for example Newsom ran for POTUS and his VP pick was also from California. California electors could only cast their votes for one of them (obviously they’d choose to apply them to the POTUS seat. So the VP might lose to the VP of other party! So stupid. When Bush picked Cheney, Cheney was a resident of Texas and moved to Wyoming so Texas electors would be able cast their votes for him.

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They could be from the same state but picking a VP candidate from another part of the country is seen as one way to balance a ticket. They could pick someone from a swing state in the hopes it would help win that state, or try to balance out the ticket on the political spectrum by picking someone further left or right than the presidential candidate. In 2008 the Democrats balanced out the young black candidate with an old conservative white VP candidate, so there are other ways to balance a ticket.

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Electors cannot cast a vote for 2 people from their state according to 12th amendment. It’s not an outright ban say if it was CA or FL the VP might not get enough votes.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s not a requirement, it’s more a tradition because the “electoral math” is better.