• thedruid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    here’s the issue.

    There’s been a tax on the second amendment for decades. Having to pay the fees for licensing, and the classes, means there’s a cost to exercise the right. Since people with no knowledge about the subject made sure to make it as expensive as possible to enjoy a right, the psychopaths in office now have precedent.

    one cannot tax one right and hand wave another. So . which do you think will fall first?

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        is there an Amendment that bans a tax on any right?

        if not then your argument has no standing.

        Point is, requiring people to pay to exercise rights is now enshrined. and we watched it happen.

        • SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The 24th amendment very specifically bans polling taxes

          The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

          • thedruid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Miller v. US, 230 F2d 489 “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”

            Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

            US Supreme Court in Hurtado v. California 110 US 516: “The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.”

            Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F2d 946(1973) “… there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights”

            Also in Murdock: “a person cannot be compelled “to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.”"

            • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.

              Irrelevant to this conversation.

              Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.

              By this logic, voter registration isn’t in the constitution, so you might be able to make the argument that it violates the 14th, 15th, 19th, and 24th amendments. Again, by this logic, regardless of if people have proper voting registration or any voting registration at all, they should still be able to vote anyways. The 4 Democrats mentioned in the above article pass a law against the above.

              The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.

              Tell that to the Republicans that introduced the above bill.

              there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights

              What about the right to protest of UCLA students last April being violated because of false claims of anti-semitism, or the right to protest of Columbia students last March because of similar false claims? Did the US care about imposing sanctions or penalties on those people, or did they just detain and deport them instead?

              a person cannot be compelled “to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.”

              Again, tell that to Republicans that introduced the above bill.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      one cannot tax one right and hand wave another

      Clearly you’re wrong because ones been being taxed and the other hasn’t. There’s a direct ban on poll taxes in the constitution, there is no such things for guns

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      So which amendment bans taxes on gun ownership. Must have missed that one.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dont stop! I’m playing sad violin music to back you up! keep typing, think of the children who wont get to fire guns without your continued effort.

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Jesus Christ what’s the matter with you! I didn’t think id see the same type of insulting children here as on reddit. What ever happened to civil discourse?

          • thedruid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Umm. I don’t own a modern firearm

            Don’t be so antagonistic. No one’s asking for sympathy. Why so angry?

            • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Lol up and down this thread crying about gun taxes. “Why so angry?” You’re that kind of redditor lol. I’d say go back, but I’ll bet you’re one of the ones that actually earned your ban.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          ( sad violin music intensifies, with frett pounding added to simulate bullet firing noises )

          Its about time someone spoke up for pew-pew owners rights. Why do the anti school shooting folks get all the press?

          How dare everyone not consider my gawd-given personal rights to mass casualty tools.

          /s

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s been a tax on the second amendment for decades. Having to pay the fees for licensing, and the classes, means there’s a cost to exercise the right.

      I looked at the receipt for a recent gun purchase, a rifle, and there are zero taxes or fees on it except sales tax which applies to nearly all items (such as video games or automobiles) for sale. There were no required licenses or classes to purchase or own this firearm.

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        in your state. Where I am there are requirements for everything. from buying ammo to getting separate licenses for long guns and pistols.

        the weapon itself is not what I’m talking about. of course that’s taxable.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          So your beef is with a State (or municipal) government. That isn’t quite the same as a restriction at the Federal level that we’re discussing here.

          • thedruid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is though. The constitution is the law and it does give supremacy to the feds. Meaning a state or municipal law gives way to federal laws when there are none.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Again, I think this is a tangent, but even you admit that you are able to buy a gun and own in with these taxes in place. Your 2nd Amendment right is clearly intact. There’s no Constitutional right protecting gun ownership from taxation. Where that isn’t the case with voting. The 24th Amendment protects your right to vote without any fee. Gun ownership has no corresponding Constitutional protection.

              • thedruid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                No. In my state you cannot unless you pay for the classes , fingerprinting and background checks , etc…

                Do not get me wrong I am for classes , and background checks.

                I don’t believe those should cost the prospective owner though.

                Now if there was no cost and those were required, I wouldn’t say a word. I hope my point is a bit clearer

                • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  No. In my state you cannot unless you pay for the classes , fingerprinting and background checks , etc…

                  That’s sounds like, yes, with extra steps. I understand not liking the extra steps, but they aren’t unconstitutional.

                  Now if there was no cost and those were required, I wouldn’t say a word. I hope my point is a bit clearer

                  Your point is clear, but not supported by the Constitution. Taxes and fees, by themselves, aren’t prohibition of freedom. Poll taxes are, as they are specifically called out as outlawed by the Constitution.

                  • thedruid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    It has been established as I shared it earlier. .

                    But quite frankly in this timeline it doesn’t matter trump and his Nazi cronies will do as they please

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have multiple guns. Never paid for a class, don’t need a license. Only cost was in the guns and ammo. Now, I WAS taught at an early age how to handle guns safely, and am damn near brainwashed to handle them thusly (I never leave a bullet in chamber and I still clear my weapons every time I even touch them.) That said, I do need to stop being a lazy ass and finish building my ak47 instead of leaving it half assembled. Still needs a couple of American parts and I will not risk being dinged with an illegally built firearm.