In my opinion, publishing all the JFK files without any redactions including social security numbers was just based and is something the democrats should have done years ago.
Have problem with it? Direct hatred at the glowies for having audacity to place such info in their documents.
SSNs didn’t always have the super-secret status they do now. When I was in college, they used SSNs as student IDs. It was printed right on all my grade reports. Now, the US government explicitly advised, even back then, not to use SSNs as general identification. But everyone did.
So, it doesn’t take any “audacity” to list SSNs in CIA documents in the 60s. Back then, it couldn’t be used for financial fraud like it is today.
SSNs didn’t always have the super-secret status they do now. When I was in college, they used SSNs as student IDs. It was printed right on all my grade reports. Now, the US government explicitly advised, even back then, not to use SSNs as general identification. But everyone did.
Ah, learn more about the American system every day.
And “glowie”? Really? What are you, twelve?
If a twelve year old is using far-right anti-establishment rhetoric, I would be very concerned.
I think it’s a reference to that schizophrenic guy who thought God told him to build an operating system as the third temple. He posted a lot of crazy videos online, including some where he claimed that the CIA was following him but that they glow in the dark. A couple of years later, people on 4chan started to refer to CIA agents as “glowies” in reference to those videos.
In my opinion, publishing all the JFK files without any redactions including social security numbers was just based and is something the democrats should have done years ago.
Have problem with it? Direct hatred at the glowies for having audacity to place such info in their documents.
I have this account already tagged as Russian Propagandist in case anyone wanted to join in tagging them to continue to drown their bullshit out.
Thank you for doing the good work, I just responded to them quite unfavorably
SSNs didn’t always have the super-secret status they do now. When I was in college, they used SSNs as student IDs. It was printed right on all my grade reports. Now, the US government explicitly advised, even back then, not to use SSNs as general identification. But everyone did.
So, it doesn’t take any “audacity” to list SSNs in CIA documents in the 60s. Back then, it couldn’t be used for financial fraud like it is today.
And “glowie”? Really? What are you, twelve?
Ah, learn more about the American system every day.
If a twelve year old is using far-right anti-establishment rhetoric, I would be very concerned.
You haven’t noticed that most “far right anti establishment rhetoric” these days started with immature losers on 4chan?
Good point.
“Based”? What are you, 15?
…and wtf is a “glowie?”
I think it’s a reference to that schizophrenic guy who thought God told him to build an operating system as the third temple. He posted a lot of crazy videos online, including some where he claimed that the CIA was following him but that they glow in the dark. A couple of years later, people on 4chan started to refer to CIA agents as “glowies” in reference to those videos.
Yes, Terry Davis.
Sorry but no, it is also used by far-right anti-establishment types.
Appropriating terms used by the far right despite being a leftist is just my thing.
Bro, get the fuck off this website and haul your ass back to 4chan where you belong on its containment board you fucking weirdo
Well rude, but I can easily understand your anger.