Andy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前They can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down13
arrow-up1530arrow-down1imageThey can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netAndy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前message-square64fedilink
minus-squareSpruceBringsteen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·2 个月前What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 个月前I think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-22 个月前Why stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
minus-squareblindbunny@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 个月前No no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
minus-squarePM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 个月前“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前Sounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes. You can’t expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 个月前everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 个月前Insurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 个月前anytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 个月前Probably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前Someone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock
What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
I think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
Why stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
No no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
That’s definitely a more productive solution
“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
Sounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes.
You can’t expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.
everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
Insurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
anytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
Probably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
Someone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock