British police faced backlash on Tuesday over the case ⁠of an 18-year-old student who was handcuffed as he lay dying from stab wounds after ⁠his killer falsely alleged a racist attack.
  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    482·
    14 hours ago

    “We should respond to this with pure cold rage.”

    No. You’re adults and leaders. You can be angry but your response should be rational, not emotional.

    • Cypher@aussie.zoneEnglish
      416·
      9 hours ago

      The rational solution is to execute the murderer, jail the family for a long time for obstruction of justice and when their sentences are up deport them.

      The police who cuffed a dying man should be jailed for negligent manslaughter.

        • Cypher@aussie.zoneEnglish
          26·
          5 hours ago

          His guilt is beyond any doubt and a bullet is cheap.

          There is zero reason to house and feed him.

          He should be executed and his rotten family should pick up the bill.

            • Cypher@aussie.zoneEnglish
              11·
              3 hours ago

              You think the death penalty is edgy? It has been used for thousands of years across numerous societies.

            • Cypher@aussie.zoneEnglish
              44·
              8 hours ago

              Bzzzzzt wrong! The answer to killing under Sharia law is Diyah or blood money.

              Thanks for playing.

              • perestroika@slrpnk.netEnglish
                21·
                5 hours ago

                Um, what part of the word “Sikh” made you think of sharia?

                Now, as for the killer, he got the highest punishment a reasonable country gives: life in prison.

                Beyond that, it regularly starts happening that people who aren’t guilty get executed. It’s very hard to write a law describing when a murder is “clear enough”. Nobody has managed so far. All the countries which sentence people to death sometimes execute people who aren’t guilty.