Hey folks! I know a while back there was a kerfuffle because syncthing-fork for Android went dark, and then a new person showed up and claimed everything was cool and they’d been privately given the keys or something, and people were concerned. I pinned my fdroid version to the at-that-time-current release until we got clarity.

Well, it’s been a while and I just noticed I’m still on that old release. So… how’d it turn out? Do we like the new person yet? Is there a promising fork y’all are using? Or is the project dead? I’m sure I could just go look at the repo, but I’m also sure the repo would tell me “yeah, we’re all cool” no matter what, so I’m curious what the community feelings are. Have there even been any useful new releases since then?

Thanks!

  • Leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I switched from Bitwarden to keepassxc (pc) and keepassdx (android) and installed syncthing (pc) and syncthing-fork (android) to sync the db file a couple of weeks ago - all works fine, no dramas.

  • IanTwenty@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    16 hours ago

    F-droid themselves gave an update in April:

    https://f-droid.org/en/2026/04/03/twif.html

    If you’ve been holding off updating Syncthing-Fork we have two pieces of news for you. First, the original dev continues to collaborate still, we know this was a pain point back then. Second, we’ve just added BasicSync, A simple app for running Syncthing, which just controls Syncthing’s running behaviour as hands off as possible, while the original service hums in the background.

    So it seems since the handover things have settled but there is also a new fork which takes a more bare-bones approach.

    • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is amazing. So what you’re saying is that the answer is that there are now three separate syncthing apps, which are all similarly functional and in collaboration with each other?

      • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Two built for Android, Syncthing-fork and BasicSync, and the latter is meant to be less featured and simpler (or basic! Wow, it’s in the name!)

        And the third is the desktop service for Linux, Windows, etc. Technically, you can install the Linux one with Termux or similar on Android, but it’s a little jankey. It is possible though, as somebody else has already mentioned!

      • Star@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m using BasicSync since a few weeks, the location permission is completely optional. This is what the app says:

        Location permissions are optional and are only needed when restricting allowed Wi-Fi networks. Even if the permissions are granted, they will not be used unless there are allowed Wi-Fi networks configured.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          What a bs permission to have been invented.
          It should be it’s own special network permission or something but what the hell does that have to do with the general meaning of “location”?.
          Just allow the app to see what SSID I am connected to if I want to allow that

          Sry for having to endure my rant

          • theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            It’s actually a bit informative. I believe Android approximates location using the SSID/WiFi information, so it’s not just network that it’s used for.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Location is such a weird permission…
        For example the permission is also needed to find local devices via bluetooth (eyeroll)…
        And even then, local device finding is a sub-permission of location…

        • timochka@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think that’s more about telling users though that if they let an apl find local devices, that can be used to deduce your location.

      • tinsukE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BasicSync#permissions

        ACCESS_WIFI_STATE, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION, FOREGROUND_SERVICE_LOCATION

        Optionally used for stopping Syncthing unless connected to specific Wi-Fi networks.

        And location isn’t a permission granted by default on install (unlike Internet access), the user has to approve of it explicitly.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        To know if you are on your home network and use direct lan etc, rather than finding a sync relay in the cloud…something like that.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        At least it’s open source so anyone can look at the code and figure out why it asks for the permissions.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Looks like I’ll have to setup BasicSync. I still don’t trust Syncthing-Fork. The way things went down don’t give me any confidence it could happen again but worse e.g the dev introduces something like a “fuck zionists” patch that wipes everything if you’re on an isralean IP. Then I’d be putting myself in danger for using a VPN or TOR exit node in Israel. Not taking that risk.

      Thanks for the writeup.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Source for that?
        I don’t like that a software with access to my files has logic for this behavior.
        I use syncthing as a backup-tool so it would be, let’s say bad if it should happen.

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That commenter was using an example of something very bad that could happen if the fork got handed off to someone else again but worse, not something that actually happened

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m currently running the latest version from F-droid, it’s doing what it should do. No red flags I can see.

    I know the current owner as much as the previous one so no difference for me.

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    New one seems fine to me, haven’t had any issues with it, haven’t been privy to any malicious behavior or past actions that the developers might have done, so personally I find it pretty trustworthy.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yeah, I kinda held on to the old version for a while too TBH, syncthing-fork had a problem where I couldn’t get it to work the way I wanted it, so I’d gone back to syncthing, then with all the kerfuffle, I just stayed there.

    Some time earlier this year I tentatively upgraded 1 phone and a tablet (it’s used as slideshow screensaver…) and it all seems to work ok.

    The GUI isn’t quite as good as the native webUI, but it’s still accessible, so all’s good.

    There was a change in the syncthing “DB” a while ago, so it might take a while to rescan things if you have a lot of small files, but feel confident to change.

  • snowydroopz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I use Localsend, to me it feels like what Syncthing wishes it was on some level, Localsend is limited to only sending messages to devices using the same network, however, on pure simplicity, Localsend is the goat. Maybe I’m just too stupid for Syncthing, I watched the tutorial and all, it just seemed way to overcomplicated to me on certain aspects, even when it worked it felt like I did something wrong, it was never as simple as “pick file, send file”. Localsend is my go-to nowadays and does all i needed from Syncthing 10x as fast and with a much better UI.

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Different use cases entirely.

      Localsend is like air drop on your local network.

      Syncthing automatically keeps a chosen folder of files in sync on multiple devices across networks.

    • Ghoelian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Localsend doesn’t automatically sync files between devices does it? Afaik you can only send files as a manual thing you have to do for every file. They’re intended for different things.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      it was never as simple as “pick file, send file”.

      Not really what Syncthing’s for. Localsend is definitely much better suited for that. (though there is the option on the unofficial Syncthing Android app to use the Android share feature to “save to Syncthing”, then pick which folder you want Syncthing to save it to before syncing it to whatever devices that folder is synced with, though again, not really made for that as a core feature, Localsend is better for that)

      Syncthing is more for if you just want a folder on one device to be replicated to another device. For example, my Camera folder on my phone syncs to my PC so I always have a second copy of all my photos by default.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Be aware that syncthing is not designed for back up. If something happened to delete ir corrupt your data on ine device, that would also duplicate. (There are settings per folder to change sone of this behaviour)

      • snowydroopz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I see, that would be really helpful, and I did know that as the name suggest SYNCthing was obv for syncing, but, I just couldnt get it to work properly on my zorin and samsung together, whether the folder would never be created in the directory i inputed and so on, so as I last ditch I was like “wth, may as well use it to save stuff” then I found local send, the ease of it almost makes it as easy as syncing…almost