

that’s disingenuous. you don’t need to feed google with money to support creators who want to be supported, they’ll have multiple channels for donations
but also you don’t need to pay google, or watch youtube at all, to participate in society.


that’s disingenuous. you don’t need to feed google with money to support creators who want to be supported, they’ll have multiple channels for donations
but also you don’t need to pay google, or watch youtube at all, to participate in society.


an automatic ATM machine, no less!
I’m torn in how to feel about this. it was stupid to turn to a chatbot for things you know nothing about, as you then can’t even verify anything. and when you are a beginner, you probably shouldn’t start with SAS hardware either because it’s more complicated with the added enterprise features.


port 7657 is to the router console, do you really want that? if no, you need to check the tunnel manager for the port configured for your eepsite. its in the I2P Hidden Services list. the default entry uses port 7658
if you followed the advice of others to change the advanced config, you should probably revert this change because you don’t need it.
btw sometimes it may be useful to also expose the router console. but since that’s only for you, you don’t want others using it, configure an encrypted leaseset for it, which makes the router console’s eepsite invisible to others on the network. you should keep the router console’s authentication when you do this. https://geti2p.net/en/blog/post/2021/09/07/Level-Up-Encrypted-Leasesets


I think that’s misleading. I doubt OP wants to access the router console with this name.
I hate it that systemd is so quick to shut down sshd when shutting down the system. it does that in the very first “round”, while it could really just keep it running till the end…
to be fair, that’s because of codec licensing issues. fedora could not safely (legally) distribute some codecs for free


it starts to become comical that any time I see you around you are just stirring shit


my point is that at least most of your points don’t make sense.


then go ahead and explicitly define the type of every variable. rust wont stop you from doing that


well if you are recompiling thousands of crates with a single thread, for a simple webapp no less, then you are doing something wrong. multiple things, actually, I count 3.


you are better off without remote control systems like that


seems right. actually you were just not responding to the questions of anyone in this chain, but always responding with irrelevant things. and thanks for the downvotes! please bring some more.


and where does forgejo support federation for issues, PRs?


if the server is compromised, all the data it stores is at risk of getting drleted or modified. so I don’t think a VPS really solves the problem.


no, forgejo doesnt have “all that”. you are totally missing the point. git is federated, of course, but the added features of forgejo or any other known git forge is not (yet).


guess what, I know how these work. running 2 dozens of services over two machines, and as I said above, I use my own root certificate… that’s how I know that lots of apps have problems of varying severity with custom root certs! usage of user-installed certs is opt-in nowadays for smartphone apps, it’s not at all like on windows or linux.
you are telling how to do things. the whole thread has been about you telling us to rent a domain for certificates and stop complaining about it being the only viable way…


Sure, but you can’t access your home network anyway if your router is turned off…
of course but most routers won’t do anything like this. and by router I mean the all in one devices people have, not enterprise gear.
Asus routers, even my 15 year old tplink archer A7 could
with factory firmware?


the only router firmware I have seen be able to do that is openwrt, and maybe mikrotik’s. none of these are common though, but if you can do this then yes this is a pretty efficient solution
it already works in browsers. other clients would need to implement it themselves. I have no idea if this is viable with battery powered devices on a data cap