GPMI is not any better with all its “security” functions. It’s security against the user, the american way but in chinese flavour.

it also does not sound to be good idea to have high power delivery so near to normal signal wires, noise, shorts, more power strain on the graphics hardware, and all that.

displayport for the win.

it sounds stupid to force through the computer a meaningful amount of energy that is only intended for a peripheral

I would care if they haven’t fucked people over and especially the open source community.

that’s probably the BIOS only loading the configuration on the first boot. you could try enabling fast boot or disabling the right energy saving settings in the BIOS and see if that fixes it.

The only limitation I know is WOL doesn’t work after a power outage, because the switch and RPI doesn’t know where to find the target machine

maybe, but the pi does not need to know that, only the mac address and the interface. the switch doesn’t need to know either because it’s a broadcast frame, it’s forwarded to all cables. the problem sometimes is that if you configure WOL from linux, the network adapter will probably forget on power cycling that it is supposed to react to magic packets. I think not all hardware is susceptible to that, but even then it could help to configure WOL in the BIOS

@[email protected]

yeah, unfortunately they often put that toggle behind a registration requirement

oh, didn’t know what tech it uses for that. that’s sad

yeah, the 2 person startup big corporation. you lost your mind. if you want to make hardware, you can’t do it without a business, you’ll need to be handling money in quantities. not all businesses are bad.

I think they are not selling anything yet, they are just providing software for camera and client and build instructions for hardware

I thought ONVIF is just the control, not the stream. the stream is normally RTSP

Frigate has support for bidir audio

Ente, a encrypted Google photos replacement, wants three S3 buckets in a production environment

if it allows that, 1 is fine until you have backups. Ente wants to do backups with live failover for enterprise grade uptime, but you don’t need that. have backups in multiple places, but a single ente server with a single S3 bucket should be ok for a small operation like this

For now, and the backups should I create a separate wireguard VPN service as a site-to-site or is there a better option?

I think a wireguard site to site VPN is a good idea for your internal traffic. backups, internal services communication between tye locations, etc. but maybe it would be easier to do with opnsense, they even have a guide for this, and you use proxmox so you are in a good position for that.

I prefer reading the release notes before updating, because if there was something I don’t like often I can’t just go back. other then that it would be better if past release notes would be readable in the app, so you can read it later.

I think apps that show the release notes right on next launch just wanted to tick off a feature request the developer did not really find useful to put enough thought into it.

but for the sake of being a successful project to the masses? It’s basically a dead end Road

I think that’s why we should still have requirements against software we run (although as some funnily say, we are free to get a refund), but not pretend that the software is more secure than it is known to be. sad that we need a VPN for security, but it is what it is.

I don’t know how could we get our devs to be more attentive to security.

it is pathetic indeed, but I think much fewer projects admit it than how many should

It should at worst give people a copy of my media if there’s a security issue.

that’s not the worst possibility. the worst possibility is an RCE into your server.

Personally I went out of my way to make this be the case, i have my instance locked into an unprivileged lxc whitelist only on syscalls which took a while to figure out the minimum needed for function but

that’s a pretty exotic setup. Exciting, but for most people learning to manage a VPN is easier

It should at worst give people a copy of my media if there’s a security issue.

that’s not the worst possibility. the worst possibility is an RCE into your server.

Personally I went out of my way to make this be the case, i have my instance locked into an unprivileged lxc whitelist only on syscalls which took a while to figure out the minimum needed for function but

that’s a pretty exotic setup. Exciting, but for most people learning to manage a VPN is easier

but you present your “wide populace” fact without giving sources too

my statement is not that many people are using passkeys today. but that if there comes a time when many people will use passkeys, they will be as careless and convenient as they are with everything else today, accepting any restrictions, because “why would anyone not use Google Passkeys? It’s the most convenient thing!”.

and not only that. I was talking about device locking but that’s only part of the problem. isn’t it that passkey receiving services can identify the client software, and decide they will only accept passkeys from x and y clients?

wait, did Godot enshittify?

what were the questions to which they gave those responses? It’s really not clear. link the source.