SlAvA UkrAnI!

  • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What part of martial law do you not understand?

    A country being invaded can be and will be overthrown if possible. In fact, it’s been done many times in European imperialist history.

    That’s why the clause exists, even before democracy was normalized in Europe. Just find someone else in line for procession and install a puppet prince.

    It’s even been abused. Some speculate that Trump would trigger martial law to stay in office - or even Netenyahu himself clinging to power.

    In the end you don’t want a captured government. That’s also historically been really bad.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    From the latest Perceptions of Democracy index, from NIRA Data:

    Ukrainians are among the most skeptical of the democratic processes in their country. Meanwhile, even a country as hotly contested as Venezuela, faith in elections is skyrocketing. And this is gathered by a western org run by a NATO official.

    • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As always, I would like to point out that these kinds of surveys of public opinion are not really evidence of anything besides public opinion itself.

      You cannot assert that a certain country has more or less of some quality simply because more people in that country said they think they do more frequently than people in a different country did.

      For example if you asked Americans (particularly those in the south or rural areas) if they thought their country was more “free” than the rest of the world, you would probably get higher numbers than you would from most other regions of the world despite the fact that America is not that free relative to much of the world.

      • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So would you say, that actively hostile imperialist western nations and their propaganda apparatus know more about democracy in Venezuela than Venezuelans?

        For example if you asked Americans (particularly those in the south or rural areas) if they thought their country was more “free” than the rest of the world, you would probably get higher numbers than you would from most other regions of the world

        Maybe this data will surprise you then:

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Trends in perception, as well as comparison, does tell a good story. In many ways it’s a superior method of data gathering on democracy than the standard method of defining democracy as whatever the Nordics are doing, and then grading everyone based on how closely they follow that.

        • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Direct comparison of perception of democracy by people who have lived in both countries would be much clearer evidence of differences in democracy itself.

          However, the raw perception of democracy without any other reference to other democracies does not allow for comparison/measurement of democracy itself but rather indicates how happy individuals feel within their current democracy.

          The data is a good story and it does encode information, but that information is more significantly influenced by culture, current events, and overall happiness of the populace than it is by “level of democracy”

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Sure. When I mean comparison, I mean in trends. If a country scores lower in one year while another scores higher, and this trend repeats, it’s a sign of improving and decaying conditions. Democracy isn’t really something you can measure directly, which makes the entire subject pretty muddy.

            • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              that’s why I put quotes around “level of democracy.” If everyone in a country had to vote directly for any and all government action, that is kind of the purest democracy possible, but it would not be a very effective method of government especially for large countries.

              In order to rank democracy in a meaningful way, one would need to decide on what the desired outcomes of a “good” democracy are and which outcomes are most important etc. which would make the scale subjective.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Even that would not be democratic, as it ignores the role of ownership of production and distribution. In a capitalist economy, such would still be subject to the same mechanisms preventing bourgeois democracy from following the will of the proletariat.

  • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t see any blue states going along with any potential attempts by Trump to cancel the election. There is literally nobody who is going to invade mainland USA in the next 3 years. It’s just not in the cards. In Ukraine, women my age notice that 10% of their dating pool is gone (dead, moved abroad, missing?). The average US citizen is going to experience whatever obvious false flag, just something less impactful than 2020s “wearing masks”, even if that’s literally a drone strike from Latin America, and they’re going to cancel elections over it?

  • astar26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Just for factual correctness (don’t actually care about your opinion) - no Israeli election was cancelled. Bibi himself lost an election in 2020.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Venezuela is more democratic than western countries. Why is it that westerners demonize revolutionaries for not following the political process, and demonize electoralists for following the political process anyways? Because both are threats to capital.

      • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        …maybe because many westerners are worried about losing their democracy? I mean, when democracies Fall, they usually don’t make room for better democracies, historically speaking.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Westerners in general don’t have democracy, capitalists have democracy in the west. That’s why the implementation of socialism is necessary, bringing democracy to the working classes and kicking out the capitalists.

          • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Just because the majority of the people in a country disagree with you doesn’t mean it’s not a democracy. In many western countries there are (still) free and fair elections. This is verifiable. But democracy lives off of active participation, and there are people (read: fascists) who see democracy as a threat and do everything they can to sow FUD in order to reduce election participation.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Elections are not indicative of democracy. The fact that capital is what determines which parties are viable, what candidates are allowed to run, and controls the entire economy means that elections in capitalism are more of a pressure valve than an actual way to get your voice across. Capitalism is incompatible with working class democracy.

              • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                32 minutes ago

                How the hell are elections not indicative of democracy? I mean, just because you have elections doesn’t mean you have a proper democracy (e.g. if there is only one party available), but how those elections are run says a lot. They’re the core of any democracy. Democracy is, by definition, the people being ruled by the people. So you need some form of governance that is accountable to the people.

                And capital is far from the only thing that determines if parties are viable. Yes, it plays too much of a role (especially in the US, but there are many western countries that aren’t the US), but let’s not pretend it’s some mysterious being that decides everything. That ignores so many important factors.

                • zbyte64@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 minutes ago

                  Capitalism is not some mysterious being, its a phenomenon and it is fundamentally incompatible with democracy. If the workplace was democratized then you would not have capitalism.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol you still believe what the Epstein Burger Reich tells you about other countries, that’s fucking embarassing

    • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They literally had an election and it was a very close run thing we’re the US backed puppet nearly won.

      But yeah, sure, it’s a dictatorship, whatever…

    • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      True… thankfully the glorious US bombed those undemocratic dictator fishing ships and invaded their country to righteously kidnap their undemocratically un-elected president and his heinous wife while killing people.

      Now it gets to be a true democracy! Where their country starts going through liberalization and worsening social nets as their future is sold off to private sectors. Truly no longer a dictatorship.

      • Danitos@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        When did I claim it wasn’t? Why do you all have an obsession of dimissing any criticism of Venezuela with a reference to US? I’m not even from there.