Speaking to Emerge, Harris raised the idea of Supreme Court reform “including the notion of expanding the court.”
That’s coming out swinging? Maybe if she releases a signed public statement saying she supports court expansion and if she thinks an un-filibuster-able bill would be an appropriate way to do so regardless of what the Senate Parliamentarian says I’d believe it, but this seems so vague it’s meaningless.
Well, if we’re talking literal, there’s also the issue that your comment was factually-incorrect and also kinda racist, so maybe you don’t wanna go there.
That’s coming out swinging? Maybe if she releases a signed public statement saying she supports court expansion and if she thinks an un-filibuster-able bill would be an appropriate way to do so regardless of what the Senate Parliamentarian says I’d believe it, but this seems so vague it’s meaningless.
You don’t decide, the black votes in the south will decide.
Not after the recent SCOTUS ruling, they won’t!
spoiler
(Yes, I’m aware gerrymandering doesn’t apply to the presidential election. It’s a joke.)
Yes, they literally will. It’s a private primary. The DNC literally dosent have to follow that SCOTUS ruling.
Well, if we’re talking literal, there’s also the issue that your comment was factually-incorrect and also kinda racist, so maybe you don’t wanna go there.
I thought for sure you’d be a banner-waving Harrisitarian after that article.
(/s, obvs.)