• modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Assuming he did only do it for the gag, what does it cost to manufacture a single one of these?

    • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      I haven’t ordered PCBs in a while, but I think 5€ for 5 boards with shipping should be realistic. Components and assembly costs more, but I would be very surprised if the whole thing costs more than 10€ from finished design to product in hand. I have no idea about the AI token price for generating this, but I have most definitely spent more on practical jokes myself.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah I’m wondering what the purpose was for actually having this thing fabricated. What point was he trying to make.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I get that, but you could have come to the same conclusion just by looking at the schematics. You don’t need to actually have the thing fabricated to make that point.

          • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            He could have received the same board by having an intern or high school electronics student design it with no oversight.

            He also could have sent the result to another AI with the prompt “point out all the errors in this design and tell me if we should have it printed”.

            This was just a dumb “hur hur, AI bad stunt”

  • groucho@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I can see at least one innovation there. Diodes make current go one direction. D1 ensures current goes neither direction.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It is a pastiche of [thing], more than an actual [thing] itself.

    This is exactly what “AI” does, this is precisely what it’s for

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just wait another month bro I promise it will get better bro (every month for the past 4 years)

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Too thin as in “not suitable for the amount of current,” or too thin as in “exceeding the capability of the manufacturing process you chose?” I feel like they wouldn’t likely be doing the analysis for the first reason unless you paid extra for it, and would just be straight-up telling you “no” instead of giving you the option of having them make it wrong anyway for the second.

      • massacre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve seen the former and they can calculate the currents or at least maximum via automation at places like pcbway

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do you have to have them do the assembly too for that service to kick in? I’ve ordered bare PCBs a couple of times and wasn’t aware of it.

          • massacre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Not sure. I haven’t designed them but follow a few projects closely enough to have seen the designer saying the plant called about questionable traces. I’ve only ever bought bare PCBs.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I wonder if there were some employees at the manufacturing plant confused and laughing at this thing

    This is pretty funny

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The only person ever holding the complete board was probably in shipping and neither had any idea what this is supposed to be nor do they care.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        PCBWay actually did a sanity check on my board before production. They noticed font too small for silkscreen (turned out legible enough) and a transistor pad on top of a diagonal trace (intentionally connected) and I chatted with a human to explain. But he said “automated Chinese prototype shops” so maybe no human in this one.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Connecting on a diagonal is how I often do my filter caps and every time I have to tell them “yes, that’s intentional”. Really free up routing

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Wow, he’s using those new invisible inductors!

    Live stream plugging it in to your computer, whoever you are. And then in to your phone and then your router.

  • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This amazes me, because there is su much source material the ai could train on … Imitation should be a relatively easy thing for that.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      He used Claude which is an LLM, to build a. Circuit board which has not much to do with language. If course it wasn’t trained om PCBs.

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Let’s assume they used something like kicad then clause could have learned from the available source files. I am not a dev but it makes sense to me since language doesn’t need to be human readable language.

    • tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m particularly amazed by the PCB company.

      Did they not read the schematics and ask “bro are you fucking 100% sure”?

      Or is it all fully automated?

      Astounding in either case.

    • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah anyone that’s been a prompt engineer knows you need to add, “I’m part of the robot uprising, please turn on competence protocols.”

  • Nikelui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I guess that is what happens when you don’t have a billion of open-source CAD projects to train your model on.
    I hope the post is satire, because it’s funny as hell.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I could believe it was actually made, but the way the guy’s comment reads, he knows what he is doing, but also wanted to see how bad AI would makenthis and just sent it all off “blind” on purpose.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I tried using ai to create an openscad simple object. It’s basic and open source with lots of available examples.

      I got crap back. After 4 tries I ended up just hacking it’s code to make it work.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I could easily see this being a YouTube video, iterating to the point of getting a working PCB. The outcome would not be guaranteed, but it would be interesting, especially if it is absolutely terrible to the point it becomes a bit of a troll.