• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    bible. ewwww. definately would go with lord of the rings if im limited on what fantasy stories I could read.

  • nocturne@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Are those my only choices? There are no other books than the bible or "other religions "?

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wouldn’t think about any religion at all.

    Well, maybe I’d read some Norse mythology. I’m not very familiar with that and some of it sounds pretty interesting.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you think Loki is fun, you should try the Fenian Cycle of Irish/Gaelic mythology. You’d probably get a kick out of the kid raised by his aunt the druidess and her warrior-woman “Roommate” who goes on to fight a giant boar, become a genius by sucking his thumb while cooking salmon, and to become leader of the high king’s own mercenary company after discovering his divine heritage.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think kinda the appeal though is the god thing. like most greek/roman is about the heroes and not as much about the gods. The way loki goes from just trickster god that is actually kinda liked for being fun and taking one for the team to get valhalla built. He got sorta worse and worse but never crossed the line really till he ate the witches heart.

          • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If that’s the part you like, then you’d love the two battles of Mag Tuired. The absolute shenanigans the Tuatha De got up to fighting the Fomorians was legendary. Their analog of Tyr coming back with a silver hand that moves like flesh to replace his lost one and retake the throne of the gods was wild.

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I probably would have zero interest in either unless I was bored to death and those were the only reading available

  • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have zero interest in the Bible beyond the initial curiosity that led me to read it 30 years ago. Once was enough.

    If the only books available to me are the texts of world religions, give me the myths and sagas of the Nordic peoples. At least they invented the modern novel and have stuff that’s entertaining to read.

  • notsosure@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I happen to be in jail just now, so I can consider myself a bid of an expert on this dopic. I’ve noticed that the paper of the quaran is rougher than the average bible paper, so the answer should be clear.

    • zxqwas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      The question itself is fine but the presumption in the question that there exists no people with different faith or opinion, or that they are not worth asking rubbed me the wrong way.

    • cuboc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I did not vote, but the premise that I would read any religious text when I’m in jail is prepostorous.

    • axh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      it turns out “nostupidquestion” for some people means “do not post stupid questions” instead of “there are no stupid questions”.

      I up voted, because I still believe the second meaning is correct and people shouldn’t worry about posting questions here.

      But I have to admit, I see absolutely no relation between the “if” part and the “would you” part of this question, which makes it really weird for me.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        When a question tries to make you swallow a bullshit payload, if feels like a manipulative question rather than a stupid one.

        This post implies that the obvious norms are:

        • you already are reading the bible and believe in it
        • you would want to read it in prison, and could
        • the only alternative is to go into other religious books and religions

        If someone asks “are black people the only inferior ones, or is it the case for asian people too?” it’s not a stupid question, it’s not even a question, it’s an attack. And while there is more room for doubt in the question of the post, it is still loaded with religious propaganda which is shitty as fuck.

      • axh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Also the assumption that people would “stick with the Bible” ignores the “dozens” of people in the world who were not Christians to begin with… They might be a bit upset about that.

        • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It makes me wonder if OP is from somewhere where only religious texts are available in prison

            • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              A US state is currently trying to restrict what books a prisoner can have. Hasn’t passed yet, as far as I know, but I’m guessing that’s the genesis of this particular dubious question.