I mean now yeah but like in the 80’s and even 90’s not as much. wrath of con and 4 did relatively well and with blockbuster likely more people saw it. Despite that sci fi was really niche back then. How about like knowing who captain picard was in 1995.

pewdiepie is one of the modern celebraties that it kinda annoys me that I recognize the name. I feel like if I had not been a nerd and somehow I knew who captain kirk was even though I did not like sci fi. if I was not a nerd. I certainly like sci fi and know who captain kirk is.

see. this is exactly it. your last paragraph makes it like its some kind of thing. much like the title. but its a wierd thing some nutters guys have done. Its literally like a spouse poisoning story which again if a few were collected together and titled like that would be wierd. I honestly don’t care about your view of my convsersing and Im going to just stop this conversation as from my perspective its getting stupid.

If it took from the 1800’s to societ creating the internet and connecting a popluations of 8 billion people in 2026 for the term to catch on. It was not happening much and it does not happen much we know that. There are all sorts of terms im sure from the 1800’s that were niche enough no one knows them now. Maybe something will bring it forward. There is nothing wrong with the term itself and its and articles like these are not uncommon. As I said in another part of my, apparently, very constroversial take. There was a section in the sunday paper that might have an article like this but the title would not be this internet wierd click baity thing.

I feel you feel you have some sort of gotcha. This is simply not how casual conversation works. I did not shift my focus I just did not put enough detail initially. My comment did not even need to be about this particular article it could be about any niche thing that makes it sound like its more of a thing than it is.

If you mean your parents then I am to. I honestly don’t think I could have finished college if I had done it this millenium. I cam out with a debt equivalent to a car loan. Granted a luxury car but still. I see debt levels that are mortgage level now. Having a car loan without a car is one thing but having a mortgage without a house is another. I often think about how if I had grabbed a nice janitor position after high school and invested the money I put toward college I would be much better off now.

So I did read the article. You keep on not reading my comments apparently. I mentioned I get the people in the circle having a term but its the title. The way the title is written including using he term. If it was a common term for an oft encountered situation it would be one thing and it makes sense for the article to mention it but the title is where it gets wierd. I dunno how to make myself more clear through this conversation honestly.

not warrant attention to give it a name. alpine divorce.

well and thats the thing with this back and forth im having with another person. they are taking the track I don’t like the article but I just don’t like the title and the way its common with the social media age. I mean I could totally see this in that one section of the sunday paper that dives deeper into things like this.

maybe but its not the sum totality of it. So I assume communists would like the gpl but view it as unnecessary. I mean judging from what I have heard and read for stallman. I think he would like the gpl to be unnecessary. That all knowledge be free. Its ip law that requires it because of monotenazation of it. So it uses ip law against itself.

again. its the title.

So any time somone does not change their mind to someone else its dieing on a hill. What do you keep repeating false things like bothering me for the stories being shared or not believing it. My problem is with the title and making things like they are bigger than they are. Women have been abandoned by their partners on hiking trails but women are not being abandoned by their partners on hiking trails as a common occurence. Think of it this way. Would it make sense to have an article go through some of the cases of men being poisoned and title it? Men are being murdered by their partners. Whats behind the poisoners divorce.

A lot of value in capitalism comes from uncompensated work. I don’t consider it communism as much as protecting work from exploitation.

Im not arguing it does not happen just that it does not happen that often. Its not a craze sweeping the globe. Its something that has happened. There are likely far more prevalent things that don’t get a name or recognition. Did you even get the reason I put down how common things that are considered very uncommon are?

Im not saying they should not write and article about it Im saying it should not title itself like it its some sort of thing. Something along the lines of. The stories of women who have encountered the unthinkable. Abandoned in the wilds.

What are you talking about? It goes through some individual stories. There is nothing that backs up its like a common occurence or a massive uptick or something.

Im not disbelieving. I just find articles with titles that make things out to be a common occurrence or a thing to be wierd when its a rarity. I mean I even get the term because that comes from the group who in talking with each other start using it and with the internet that possible.

Im still not really sure here as I have also seen things where yeah you can find people who experienced the same thing but the numbers are not really taken into account. Just hearing tiktok makes me skeptical. I mean with billions people hundreds is like .00001%. Like chance of having experienced a mugging is .1% in the us. I will say though that it really boggles my mind the whole many may not be ill intent but then again that makes me more inclined to think of it as nutters. Like the incidence of schizophrenia is less than 1 in 100 but greater than 1 in a thousand. So like the news articles can be like. Schizophrenic wave continues to sweep the planet!

how often does this actually happen. I remember seeing a news item that mentioned a previous but to call it alpine devorce it would have to be at least 3 figures here or its just nutters the way other nutter activity is.

yeah I mean you have months to live and your going to spend it sucking dick.