• theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People are upset about the spreading of misinformation not the idea that somehow your precious 1-10 rating system for women might be compromised. That does not matter.

  • wizzkidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I guess there would be no problem with AI editing as long as it can be replicated outside virtual life in reality too.

  • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Pushup bras are really fuckin’ comfy. They have extra padding on the bottom so it’s like your tits get to rest on a cloud all day. I wear them purely for that reason. I wear makeup and pushup bras because I like them. I know some guys tend to find this hard to believe but we women don’t exist to please you.

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Dude the way you compare a dehumanizing device to manipulate and control information at the core with a method to make oneself feel better about oneself is most non-triumphant.

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The attempt to compare the capability of psychological manipulation between AI and squished boobs is absolutely comical.

      • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This sounds like an argument that an incel would make. You’re supposed to be intelligent enough not to be swayed by the presence of tits.

        • vikinghoarder@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You really like tits, I also wrote about other forms of changing a person’s image to a more “attractive” look. And I consider the evaluation of “attractive” to be a primitive instinct of partner/mating selection.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            And I consider the evaluation of “attractive” to be a primitive instinct of partner/mating selection.

            Well that’s silly. Attractiveness traits are absolutely dictated by culture. Even within a culture it can differ.

            I’d go even further and say people who hold your view tend to be internally inconsistent. Let’s see if you are.

            Do you think that man are pre-programmed to want to mate with lots of partners? If yes, then you also must believe that there isn’t an instinct to care about attractiveness. The whole goal is to fuck as many people as possible, not to be picky about it. So which is it?

          • Solumbran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            All your points were about stereotypical “womanly” stuff, summarising it as “tits” to point out how incel-like it sounds is completely valid.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    People also regularly shame other people for using filters and push-up bras and (too much) make-up.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Is it also “deception” in your mind when a man wears a cap over his bald spot, grows a beard to hide his weak chin, or choses a loose-wearing shirt that conceils his beer belly?

    Or is that only limited to women?

        • vikinghoarder@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not complaining about people trying to look nicer, I’m trying to point that “not everything is as it seems” for a longer time than AI images/videos being released recently.

          • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You could compare it to something in the same environment instead of something that comes across as misogynistically charged.

            Using makeup and bra styles as your example, even if you aren’t intending any slight by it, evokes the constant societal effort to police women’s bodies. This is a huge discomfort for a majority of people either because they are women who are subjected to this, or they care about women who are dealing with it.

            A great example for less charged comparisons would be existing propaganda, things like the “got milk?” program, the push to use of Vegtable oils after WW2 when the government had a surplus and needed to do something with it, or even the decades long campaign to frame fat as the cause of the obesity epidemic everyone knew it was sugar. All of these have a very similar tone to AI suggesting to glue your pizza or cook your pasta in gasoline.

            You could even site actual fake things. Our health department is currently lead by an Anti-Vaxxer. We didn’t need a data center to make that lie stick.

            Communication is a big part of all this, we don’t know what your feelings are, just what you said. We have to guess from what you say and what was said paints you in a bad light.

  • myplacedk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    …and people called all of those “deception” when they were new.

    The question is how to deal with it. Regulation? Learn how to recognize it?