You really like tits, I also wrote about other forms of changing a person’s image to a more “attractive” look. And I consider the evaluation of “attractive” to be a primitive instinct of partner/mating selection.
And I consider the evaluation of “attractive” to be a primitive instinct of partner/mating selection.
Well that’s silly. Attractiveness traits are absolutely dictated by culture. Even within a culture it can differ.
I’d go even further and say people who hold your view tend to be internally inconsistent. Let’s see if you are.
Do you think that man are pre-programmed to want to mate with lots of partners? If yes, then you also must believe that there isn’t an instinct to care about attractiveness. The whole goal is to fuck as many people as possible, not to be picky about it. So which is it?
This sounds like an argument that an incel would make. You’re supposed to be intelligent enough not to be swayed by the presence of tits.
You really like tits, I also wrote about other forms of changing a person’s image to a more “attractive” look. And I consider the evaluation of “attractive” to be a primitive instinct of partner/mating selection.
Well that’s silly. Attractiveness traits are absolutely dictated by culture. Even within a culture it can differ.
I’d go even further and say people who hold your view tend to be internally inconsistent. Let’s see if you are.
Do you think that man are pre-programmed to want to mate with lots of partners? If yes, then you also must believe that there isn’t an instinct to care about attractiveness. The whole goal is to fuck as many people as possible, not to be picky about it. So which is it?
All your points were about stereotypical “womanly” stuff, summarising it as “tits” to point out how incel-like it sounds is completely valid.