I wasn’t the one they were originally interacting with and personally had no desire to be the one they debated, the topic itself isn’t interesting because its one of pure unhinged lunacy. Like, they’re clearly operating in two separate realities. I just noticed that your fellow went to insult the moment they were challenged after posting what they posted instead of having a rebuttal to the challenge itself.
Hell, they could have explicitly come to some kind of reasoning why they thought the point or framing was itself invalid, but they did not even bother. Their gut reaction was to insult, almost certainly out of fear and anger that someone make them rethink anything or justify the shit they post.
If that is someone’s first instinct, they are an intellectual coward. Full stop. At best you are an apologist for it.
Its incredibly fragile and weak, if someone can’t back up what they have to say they’re just bullshitting and don’t want to be called out on it. Its legitimately fucking pathetic.
I wasn’t the one they were originally interacting with and personally had no desire to be the one they debated, the topic itself isn’t interesting because its one of pure unhinged lunacy. Like, they’re clearly operating in two separate realities. I just noticed that your fellow went to insult the moment they were challenged after posting what they posted instead of having a rebuttal to the challenge itself.
Hell, they could have explicitly come to some kind of reasoning why they thought the point or framing was itself invalid, but they did not even bother. Their gut reaction was to insult, almost certainly out of fear and anger that someone make them rethink anything or justify the shit they post.
If that is someone’s first instinct, they are an intellectual coward. Full stop. At best you are an apologist for it.
Its incredibly fragile and weak, if someone can’t back up what they have to say they’re just bullshitting and don’t want to be called out on it. Its legitimately fucking pathetic.