• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I suggest that there’s no meaningful benefit to be gained by looking backward rather than forward.

    Okay, as long as we also take away all the historical family wealth that goes back generations too.

    But that’s not how it works, is it? Great great great grandad gets to get rich off having slave plantations and his son gets to get rich off of Jim Crow sharecropping, and his great great great grandson gets to inherit that wealth without any complications.

    • Prime@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I do not want to be punished for something that other people did in the past before i was born.

      • wissenisstmacht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This „punishment“ or rather responsibility would not be something that the average wage earning person has to worry about financially whatsoever. There is however a lot of accumulated wealth, that could be used for much better things than the third luxury Yacht in Monaco. So if this extraordinary luxurious wealth can be traced back to exploitation and slavery, and the government would enforce this money to be used for reparations in forms of community centers, museums, research for those who’s ancestors freedom, cultural heritage and often lives were taken, this would not be a punishment. As a German I think there is good reason to individually act responsibly concerning the crimes of e.g. my great grandfather. It is not my crime, but it’s my responsibility to call it such, to do my best in every day live that something like it will not happen again. Calling that a punishment would be unfair compared to the suffering of the victims and their living relatives.