• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      True enough. But even if we had gotten a magic benevolent dictator decades ago, the damage was already done. We’re just piling it on at this point. In some aspects, maybe a speed run into hell will work out better than a long braking. Better overall, but still a disaster.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No. The less carbon that is added to the atmosphere, the less severe the damage will be. Economic collapse will only increase the motivation to rely on cheap and dirty fuels, not to mention the incentives to cut down all the trees and exterminate all the wildlife.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Less total carbon. It’s morbid, but burning ourselves out faster ends up with a smaller number than if we persist in this. If you go with some assumption that economic collapse allows us to survive… well I guess you have a point.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        if we had gotten a solution years ago, we would experience a fraction of the effects.