• Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Its because we block lemvotes on this server, because people don’t like their votes being exposed. Every server should do this.

        • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          oh, okay. It’s nice that it’s possible to do this.

          Every server should do this.

          I would say that’s for them to decide

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I doubt they’ve asked their users if they want this spying tool to hoover up their votes.

            • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              32 minutes ago

              Alright, let me ask you to clear this up for me please. I’m not a developer so I might need some simplification. This Lemvotes thing asks a Lemmy server to give up the users having voted on a particular post. For this to work I would assume the server in question must comply with this request, or store this information in a way that’s accessible in the first place ?

              • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 minutes ago

                You can read the full context of this here.

                Votes are transparently federated, but only shown to admins via a few special endpoints, in order to fight one of the biggest spam vectors currently on the fediverse, which is federated downvote spammers. Lemvotes is a single user server / spying tool to circumvent that reasonable expectation of user privacy.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        it works for some of the other instances; either it’s broken or selectively ignoring.