California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced just one day after the U.S. officially withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO) that his state would become the first to join the organization’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, in a seeming rebuke of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from international collaborations.

Newsom traveled this week to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he was scheduled to speak at an event but was canceled at the last moment. During his trip, he met with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

    • skeptomatic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’ll never happen, as nice as it sounds.
      So I’m Canadian and we have separatists in, now 2 provinces.
      Whether the latest is a conservative US psy-op, is up for debate. But that is probably part of it.
      The Quebec separatists have been angry for the total of my lifetime and being from BC I’ve mostly ignored their plight of “different culture” but I never wanted to lose that chunk of the country and to me it’s part of the greater Canadian culture.
      The Alberta “separatists” are different, they are more like traitors.
      Citing stats like, “Alberta (oil and gas province, the “Texas” of Canada) contributes more in equalization payments to other Canadians provinces!”, which is true, as a total sum.
      But the morons don’t understand that equalization payments are taken from federal taxes in a bracketed tax system, so it just means on average, Albertans are richer. The rich they cry that they’re not getting fair share…
      Epitome of greed.
      They believe because they were simply born there, moved there, that all the mineral and oil and gas profits belong to them. They’re even more idiotic to believe the producers will share these profits with them.
      They’re not taking that away from our country, and it’s worth going to war over. I think California would end up falling into the same situation of belief, though reversed between conservative and left-of-conservative views.
      They’d go to war over it. So bit of a dangerous play.

    • quips@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      China recognized long ago that all states falter after around 250 years, and that renewal is a natural part of human institution.

      The biggest mistake of the founding fathers was to assume the permanence of our institutions was okay since checks and balances were instituted. Really all they do is delay the time between cycles of corruption.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        One of the founders thought we should draft a new constitution from scratch every few years and they created the ammendment system specifically so any part could be scrapped and remade in case there were problems. They clearly didn’t think it was perfect, just good enough for the time. They certainly didn’t expect us to slow down and stop with the ammendments, at least.

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      After a century of coups and destabilisation efforts around the world, the empire will crumble from within (nothing new tbh). How poetic!

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We need an East Rome West Rome split but its blue state vs red state. Each get their own President, pool Military powers

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Or maybe a parliament with proper representation instead of this stupid system you’ve got going right now.

          • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s realistically the only fix for gerrymandering. It’s a powerful weapon, and I don’t foresee the two parties honoring any agreement not to use it.

            • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              It should be actually, if not for the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, based on the 1910 census.

              At the time the average was 210,000 constituents per representative, now we’re over 770,000 per representative. And those are averages, some districts are much higher and lower.

              Congress set the current limit, they can change it. It doesn’t require an amendment or anything complicated.