• cisco87@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    alright, what do you think is the objective of nato and what do you think is the objective of the supermegapower? we need to clarify that first in order to have a conversation

      • cisco87@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        But that does not answer my question, I could have lived also under a rock, but my post was a question, didn’t define anything or made any assumption, just asked what do you think is the objective of the russian supermegapower and what do you think is the objective of nato

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It does if you have even a bare minimum of reading comprehension. The objective of NATO was to try and break up Russia as outlined in detail in this RAND paper. The goal was to cut off Russia economically from trade and collapse its economy. That obviously didn’t happen, and now NATO finds itself in a proxy war that it lost. The goal of Russia is pretty obvious as well. It’s to remove NATO threat on its border and ideally to break up NATO. This is the goal Russia is currently accomplishing.

          • cisco87@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            It broke up nato by making countries who didn’t join for 50 years join it , see Sweden and Finland , wait, where is Finland geographically?

            Probably not on the border with the super mega power:D

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              NATO has always been a US project. Without the US there is no NATO, Europe can’t even produce basic stuff like explosives at this point. And if you don’t understand that the US turning on Europe is the direct outcome of the war, what else is there to say really.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lol, because the person they were talking to was being so humble and good faith. Shove off.

        • orc_princess@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Respectfully, your own comment came across condescending, if you weren’t trolling you might wanna be more thoughtful in the future so we understand you’re being earnest

          Edit: that was a different person lol. Nonetheless, that person was condescending, so they were condescending back. That’s the explanation.