• TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m not exactly sure what they’re getting at, but I did see someone from the Nobel Peace Prize committee call for Maduro’s removal just as the US has been ramping up its “anti-narcotics” operations in around the oil and lithium rich country, complete with extra judicial killings of Venezuelans, telling other nations to avoid their airspace and very recently seizing an oil tanker ship…

    So it kinda feels like the Nobel Peace Prize committee is trying to add justification to the cause for war that the US is trying to drum up, which is wantonly egregious, so maybe they’re implying that both the Nobel committee and Eurovision are tacit supporters and backers of imperialism.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      USA pllitics aside, the world would be a little brighter with Maduro and his regime out of Venezuela

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        in most cases yes… but not if the plan is just to turn Venezuela into an all you can eat buffet for the American regime

    • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean Maduro is pretty bad. If that statement was just about him, I don’t see the issue. They seemed to quite dislike everything Trump was doing.

      The most confusing part about that statement was Americans seeing what the Nobel prize is. They especially should stfu after electing that shit-show XD

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The peace prize did seem pretty pointless since Obama won it for doing nothing. Like don’t get me wrong I voted for the guy and wanted him to win, but it was pretty dang empty to give him the peace prize, especially since he then went on to be in charge while some really ugly stuff went down.

          • deHaga@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 minutes ago

            They have him the peace prize way before that though. Almost like a prize for winning the election

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah in hindsight it was a silly award that felt like a “thanks for not being Bush and Cheney” prize.

          • DaMummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Now look into how many bombs were dropped under Bush/Chaney, and then how many were dropped under Obama. You’ll quickly understand what the Nobel Peace Prize was for.

              • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                You’re saying that there was no Afghan war for the first 10 months of Bush’s admin and no Iraq war for the first two I take it?

                Even with that factored in, from what I can tell the Bush admin dropped nearly double (100k for Obama vs 200k for Bush), although I’m not sure where they’re sourcing their information from.

                • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  It’s a weird argument, because he got the peace prize really early into his presidency; before he could have an impact to get America to drop 100k bombs vs 200k, but also dropping a hundred thousand bombs seems like a hundred thousand more bombs than one would have to drop to be called a paragon of peace…

                  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    Oh for sure, I just don’t think it makes sense to imply he was worse than the people that created the mess in the first place who also happened to drop more bombs.