Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) announced Wednesday he plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

Why it matters: The long-shot effort centers on two scandals currently rocking the Pentagon — a new report about Signalgate and allegations of a follow-up strike against an alleged Venezuelan drug boat.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Good.

    Fuck Hakeem Jefferies. Pussy wanted to protect Hegseth because he’s more concerned about alienating the entirely fictional demographic of GOP voters who might flip Dem if the Dems become more semi-fascist

    • runiq@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, that was… something. Felt a smidgen of my soul leave my body at that point. Hegseth ordered people killed in cold blood and all you got was “won’t matter anyways?” What is wrong with you, Jefferies?

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Impeachment has lost all meaning. Trump has been impeached multiple times but remains in office. Trump loyalists in congress prevented him from seeing any consequences for those impeachments and block new impeachments. Unless something changes, the only way Hegseth is leaving is if Trump decides to remove him.

      • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If he’s fine with innocent children being murdered in cold blood by Israel why would he draw the line at innocent fishermen?

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      17 hours ago

      More and more it looks like controlled opposition. It sounded like a conspiracy theory, but I’m now truly starting to be convinced that Schummer and Jeffries were bought.

    • bradv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They’re not moving rightward to appease the voters, they’re doing it to appease the corporate donors.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Every politician has a unique means of staying in power, favours, friends, appeal, funding, handlers, Jeffrey’s may simply not be able to stay in power if he doesn’t do this. These people don’t adhere to idealistic ideology or fancy ideas, they trade in power and persuasion.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Well we should destroy the system that enables this and remove these people from any position of power indefinitely. I personally also think they should be put in fucking prison.

          • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            There are literally thousands of books written about different systems than this one, many of which I would consider better.

            • Zachariah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I have no clue which ones you’re imagining. What are some examples, and how would we put it in place?

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                12 hours ago

                The first step is ranked choice voting for everything from local to federal elections.

                First past the post is literally the worst way to operate a voting system of your goal is to get an accurate representation of the populace.

                • Zachariah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I’m very much in favor of the reforms of ranked choice and proportional representation (fairvote.org).

                  But these aren’t really a replacement after we destroy the current system. More like incremental fixes for the current system.

                  I’d still like to understand more about the vision of destroying (what’s the plan?) the system and what would come next (what’s part two of the plan?).

                  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    Read some books about successful revolutions and the states that replaced them and get back to me. You’re asking me to explain an incredibly multifaceted and complicated thing with tons of historical context and political theory behind it over Lemmy and I am not willing to do that, these are things you will have to put time and effort into learning on your own lad.