• ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The fact that they can each rule individually is really batshit insane. They should have to have a majority for any ruling. Fuck the Supreme Cunts.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This is a little different. When it comes to “emergency” things like this, coming up from one of the Federal courts, they first go to a single judge to decide how to proceed. This suit was raised in Texas, which happens to be a judicial district which Alito oversees.

      So while he did make an individual ruling reinstating the map, his job is also to help facilitate the emergency hearing with the full court. He asked for briefs by Monday, which is an indication he wants this over with quickly. (But, I think the alacrity is because he knows the fix is already in, and has enough votes among his fellow justices to uphold the new map, and they are just trying to make the justification work after the fact.)

      But like other emergency orders coming from the SCOTUS, we will just hear about a decision, and not necessarily the overall vote. But I expect that one of the Liberal judges already has her dissent written, since she knows how it will likely end up.

    • Devolution@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      If Alito can solo allow the ratfucking in Texas to occur, then Justice Jackson can absolutely decline any appeals to the California ruling I would think.