It sounds like a bunch of Democrats want to cave in exchange for no concessions whatsoever. Edit: Bloomberg has more details

Current likely Democratic votes for this:

  • Shaheen - NH
  • Hassan - NH
  • King - ME
  • Fetterman - PA
  • Peters - MI
  • Durbin - IL
  • Warner - VA
  • Kaine - VA
  • Ossoff- GA
  • Warnock - GA

If you want to change things, you need to call their DC office NOW, and leave an email if you can’t.

Edit 2: enough Democrats joined the Republicans to reopen the government with no real concessions.

The list:

  • Durbin
  • Hassan
  • King
  • Cortez Masto
  • Kaine
  • Shaheen
  • Rosen
  • Fetterman
  • Schumer
  • Gillibrand

There was a caucus meeting right before this, so the bulk of the Senate Democrats were likely OK with giving in, even if not willing to vote for it in public

  • pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fuck our government! Fuck it all to hell. So this cave means that this extended shutdown and all of the suffering people went through, was for absolutely no reason. Our government has failed us yet again. It all needs to be burnt down.

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let’s play a game.

      Suppose the Republicans shut the government down in 2026. They want to pass a law that makes Trump president for life. The Dems vote no.

      One month passes. What happens?

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They don’t have near enough votes to amend the Constitution, so it wouldn’t happen whether the government were open or not.

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Of course. But proposing a law that will never get passed doesn’t affect that one way or the other.

            • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              It will pass given the proper incentive. Just need to make the Dems sweat a bit, and they’ll pass anything.

              • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Rhe point being made is that a law on the books in direct contradiction of the Constitution does nothing. If they want to keep Trump in power past '28 without modifying the Constitution, then a law such as the one suggested would make literally no difference, legally.

                • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Oh, I’m sure that the Supreme Court can think up of something to make it legal. There’s a popular theory going around that Trump might go the “first term of the 47th” route to remain in power. If the SCOTUS goes with that definition, then Trump gets a third term without adding any amendments.

                  • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    How?

                    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice[…]

                    Nothing about “no presidency shall last more than two terms” or “no President shall be elected more than twice” to make a “47th” argument. No person.

                    Is Trump 45 a different person from Trump 47? If so, then can we prosecute Trump 45, who is not currently President, for his crimes? I mean, of course his own DoJ wouldn’t. But still.