• GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sorry? I don’t follow.

    I said in another comment that if OP was making this post as a response to another person where they were talking about infrastructure, then this post is fine. But if they’re generalizing “China bad” comments and the only response is “infrastructure”, then it’s a straw man, because arguments about infrastructure development doesn’t make up the bulk of “China bad” discourse.

    To make it more clear, let me give an example. If i say China is “bad” because it censors media, and you respond by saying “ok, but look at the difference between infrastructure in the US and China—China’s is far better”, you have strawmanned my position because i wasn’t talking about infrastructure.

    This post strawmans the whole “China bad” discourse because it makes it seem like it’s about infrastructure. I hope this makes more sense.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There’s no need for you to tediously restate your position. I understand where you’re coming from. You cannot enlighten me to your perspective as a way of making your argument seem less stupid to me.