We’re not talking about whether you like the pacing. The question you answered was about media that ‘kept making more content but needed to end.’ It doesn’t matter if you think someone should make a story that takes 30 years to tell. That’s what it is. So it hasn’t ‘kept making more’ after a point it should have ended.

So you’re just a hater that doesn’t watch the show? It’s in the finale saga. Supposedly two arcs left.

Anime: One Piece

Insane take. It’s a story that has a beginning, middle and end. It hasn’t ‘kept making more content’ when it needed to end. It hasn’t gotten to the ending.

I didn’t disagree with what you said, I told you that you were only looking at a small part of what was going on. You were such a bloviating self absorbed asshole that you refused to engage with anything outside of your mind palace. And since my patience with you was already exhausted, bye Felicia.

You’re supposed to listen to me go on for four paragraphs but I’m not going to do a single google search in deference to what you have to say

When you ask a question like this in a place like this, understand that you’re going to be getting replies from people who have jobs where you can sit around and be bored on the internet

God forbid I ask mister shower monologue to ponder a question he didn’t ask himself

So there were enough protesting leftists to rewrite the social contract but not enough to kill them off?

What do you mean, I looked at it and rejected the contention that the imperial Adventures of our ruling class has had any benefit for taxpayers and citizens.

Michael Scott declared it

That in fact it has given Force and license to the ones that have taken away our prosperity and rights. I really do not see any counter argument you are making here for how Imperial Adventures help the working class.

Here’s

my

question.

Why did the US get the New Deal

And not the Jakarta Method?

Ayyy! I’m expounding ovah here! Ohh!

You had somewhere you wanted to get to? Waddah want from me? I’m expounding!

You are again shifting the argument from the existence of a labor aristocracy. If you want to defend the concept of the imperial boomerang, go find someone who is disputing it.

I wish I didn’t just read all of that to get to the end and you just brush off the argument completely.

And that cold war hurt us, it didn’t help us, in every way you look at it.

Was that line a troll? After literally not looking at it at all, you say that? And I guess we’re talking about the cold war, and not imperialism now?

Here’s my question in response to all of that: Why did the US get the New Deal and not the Jakarta Method?

(Also, 60 to 90 does not a shitton more refinement need ;-) )

Just a stupid person saying things out of pocket

In your analysis, do you bother looking at the working and living conditions of the western countries versus the global south, or are you just looking at the wars themselves and only from the perspective of taxes? How do you think the inequity of those conditions are maintained?

You’re denying the thing by only looking at part of the thing. Obviously the capitalists aren’t doing any of this for the public good. Capitalism needs a consumer class. That class resides within the imperial core. But for instance, the idea that making the #1 and #2 largest OPEC countries US vassal states has nothing to do with energy prices is just goofy.

What do you mean you never got any of it? All the cheap shit that comes from the hyper exploited global south? The bananas that cost 50 cents? The giant TVs that cost 200 bucks? The labor aristocracy is very much a real thing.

That’s only one thing that’s true. Anyone who’s been here knows multiple things can be true at once.

lol 12 comments on hexbear

Multiple things can be true at once.

This thought terminating cliche has been overused so much by lemmy liberals lately that I roll my eyes and stop reading

Literally just an excuse to Just Say Shit™

you’re not funny and you don’t have any articulable points

It’s not 20 minutes every year. It takes all the air out of the room for the entire interval between elections. It wastes the time of the would be most politically active people for years on end.

We’re already talking about “if you don’t vote for Newsome you’re voting for Trump”