• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s one article, Dessalines has a nice collection of a bunch you can read.

    Fundamentally, though, you’re erasing the actual underlying base of the PRC vs the west, and why their loans function in qualitatively different ways: the mode of production.

    The west is driven by and driven to imperialism through its private monopolies and decaying rate of profit. They rely on export of capital in order to expropriate value, that is the drive of their economies. The west produces very little of actual value, and relies on the global south to make everything for them.

    The PRC is socialist. It doesn’t have private monopoly of the banks or industry, and it’s a production-focused economy. Of course the PRC trades with the global south for its own self-interest, socialist countries aren’t charities. However, China primarily seeks expansion of circulation, as well as access to rare earth, and new customers.

    Because of these key differences, falling under western imperialism results in stagnation, slight growth, or even reverse development, while trading with the PRC and entering BRI results in rapid development while retaining sovereignty. No country involved is doing anything for ideals or selfless reasons, but because of the differences in mode of production, the outcome for the global south is prosperity when dealing with the PRC and imperialism and stagnation when dealing with the west. That’s why the global south is rushing towards BRICS and the PRC especially.

    If you want to get started with theory, I recently updated my introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list. Section 6 gets into imperialism, from its origins all the way up to 2021.