• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • xantoxis@lemmy.onetoMemes@sopuli.xyzgood question
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s easy to get sidetracked on “magic” vs. “law”. It seems clear to me that both of these ideas are tied up in human interpretation, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to have a disagreement about them, we’d simply look up the correct meaning for “magical rules that govern vampires”.

    I suspect that we have a fundamental disagreement that we’re not going to resolve with debate, but I’ll take one more shot anyway.

    I appreciate that you’ve given a pretty succinct definition of your position: to summarize, you can only invite someone to a place where you live, although you can also invite someone into a place when you are already inside that place, regardless of whether you live there.

    Can a person who lives on the street invite a vampire? If so, then a vampire is circumscribed from any outdoor location where a person lives (sans invitation); and if not, we see that “where a person lives” is not actually the deciding concept.

    If you own multiple homes, which of them do you “live” in? Can a vampire enter all the others? Do you have to be in the home at the time of the invitation, or could you invite a vampire to use your summer house for a month while you’re in your winter home?

    All of these things cloud the idea that “living in” a place is not actually all that straightforward, and still requires the interpretation of mankind to be meaningful to the vampire. Indeed, I think the magic relies on the consent of a human, not the literal words of an invitation, and consent is innately tied to interpretation by the person consenting.

    However, if anyone in the home can make the invitation, then I think the way this plays out is: the vampire cop gets a warrant, one of the other cops goes inside, and then shouts at the vampire to come inside, and then you’re boned anyway.


  • xantoxis@lemmy.onetoMemes@sopuli.xyzgood question
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should it care about the religion of man, then?

    For that matter, why should it care about the invitation of man?

    If there are rules a vampire must follow, and those rules can be satisfied through the agency of human beings, having been interpreted by human beings, then we have to consider what a human being means by invitation.

    If a 4-year-old invites a vampire into his parents’ house, does that count? It’s not his house, either. If you think that a vampire can enter on the invitation of a 4-year-old then you must concede that people other than the owner can invite someone in. If you think that invitation is not valid, then you must concede that a vampire respects a hierarchy of rights.

    I think that the state asserts a right to invite other people into your house which supersedes your right to prevent them. We call that overriding invitation a warrant.










  • xantoxis@lemmy.onetoMemes@lemmy.mlEvery single time
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    YSK that most of these have an expiration date (and should have an expiration date). Checking the box says trust this device that I’m currently using, for a while, thus:

    • if you use another device to log in (e.g. switch from mobile to desktop browser), you will need to do it again, because security is tied to your ownership of the device, and
    • if you continue to use the same device for more than–usually–a month, you’ll be asked again because there’s a possibility your device got stolen or compromised in the meantime.

    In short, most of the time you’ll have to do this once a month, or more if you’re using more than one device, and that’s nominally to protect you.

    However, yes, a significant portion of these are just implemented by dummies, and don’t work.

    The particularly annoying ones for me are the ones on bill pay sites. If they work for a month, that doesn’t help me. I only pay my bills once a month.


  • xantoxis@lemmy.onetoMemes@sopuli.xyzI created this meme to create content
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck that. “Content” is what social media CEOs want. It’s the garbage you shovel in front of eyeballs so you can sell those eyeballs to advertisers.

    Tell a story. Make something that’s fun. Make me feel something. Don’t create “content”. You aren’t a “content creator”. You’re a person. Make something interesting to other people. Don’t be a CEO’s fucking content monkey.