

You have yet to suggest or confirm otherwise, so my point stands that your original post is unhelpful and non-contributive
You have yet to suggest or confirm otherwise, so my point stands that your original post is unhelpful and non-contributive
The issue is you didn’t confirm anything the text prediction machine told you before posting it as a confirmation of someone else’s point, and then slid into a victimized, self-righteous position when pushed back upon. One of the worst things about how we treat LLMs is comparing their output to humans – they are not, figuratively or literally, the culmination of all human knowledge, and the only fault they have comparable to humans is a lack of checking the validity of its answers. In order to use an LLM responsibly, you have to already know the answer to what you’re requesting a response to and be able to fact-check it. If you don’t do that, then the way you use it is wrong. It’s good for programming where correctness is a small set of rules, or discovering patterns where we are limited, but don’t treat it like a source of knowledge when it constantly crosses its wires.
Sounds like a globe made of hands
Did you mean to paste a source link for that quote?
Holy fuck, an exception to Betteridge’s Law
I think you still have it upside-down? The wrist is the bottom of the tattoo, so while doing pullups it would be inverted. It’s legible while standing, shaking hands, reaching out, etc.
Pretty sure it’s an upside-down forearm; note their hair toward the bottom-left of the photo.
Just a short while ago I was invited to dinner at a friend’s. Wouldn’t you know it – rounded couch. Immediately called CPS and got their kids sent somewhere they can have a chance at a decent upbringing.
Would it be for giving credit it to the Tweeter?
My b, I thought you wanted to know the origin of the meme.
How can you promise that? I’ll admit I didn’t fully understand it then, I didn’t have any deaths in my close family until much later, so I never had to reconcile with it.
In defense of nuance, I think this take is pretty unreasonable. I understand if you want to call people out for victim-blaming, but it’s very clear the commenter had no malicious intent by wondering about details about the tragedy. Why are we so eager for villains?
The edibles are for when you have to stay the night ☺️
I did the same with mine – prepared for the worst, but pleasantly surprised:
WHAT IS THE FILTER PAPER MADE OF THAT YOU USE IN YOUR TEA BAGS?
The filter paper used for Yamamotoyama tea bags is made from 100% cellulose fibers (wood). Test results conclude that chlorine dioxide is not present in our tea bag filter paper. The filter paper is not coated with the compound epichlorohydrin, and does not contain any free epichlorohydrin. Yamamotoyama tea bag filter paper is machine folded and pressed, therefore no glue is needed or used. Our teabags are completely compostable.
Do I even want to be in the loop on this one?
Taking dating advice from a divorce attorney seems like taking swimming lessons from a shark. Maybe he has good points but I can’t help but wonder about his intentions…
The italics are a nice hint. Good Poe’s Law submission.
Yeah I feel you. I don’t think the content is necessarily bad, but LLM output posing as a factual post at a bare, bare minimum needs to also include the sources that the bot used to synthesize its response. And, ideally, a statement from the poster that they checked and verified against all of them. As it is now, no one except the author has any means of checking any of that; it could be entirely made up, and very likely is misleading. All I can say is it sounds good, I guess, but a vastly more helpful response would have been a simple link to a reputable source article.