

I’m not sure – when I hear “vocal fry” I think of that open-throated low engagement of the vocal cords that makes a deeper sounding rapid popping noise. Were you referring to the same?


I’m not sure – when I hear “vocal fry” I think of that open-throated low engagement of the vocal cords that makes a deeper sounding rapid popping noise. Were you referring to the same?


For the uninitiated today’s lucky 10,000


The opposite would probably be worse, honestly.
Dude it took me 9 lifespans to finally realize that’s “ne’er-do-wells”


I think it’ll be similar to Nixon. They were similar people, anyway.


Yeah I feel you. I don’t think the content is necessarily bad, but LLM output posing as a factual post at a bare, bare minimum needs to also include the sources that the bot used to synthesize its response. And, ideally, a statement from the poster that they checked and verified against all of them. As it is now, no one except the author has any means of checking any of that; it could be entirely made up, and very likely is misleading. All I can say is it sounds good, I guess, but a vastly more helpful response would have been a simple link to a reputable source article.


You have yet to suggest or confirm otherwise, so my point stands that your original post is unhelpful and non-contributive


The issue is you didn’t confirm anything the text prediction machine told you before posting it as a confirmation of someone else’s point, and then slid into a victimized, self-righteous position when pushed back upon. One of the worst things about how we treat LLMs is comparing their output to humans – they are not, figuratively or literally, the culmination of all human knowledge, and the only fault they have comparable to humans is a lack of checking the validity of its answers. In order to use an LLM responsibly, you have to already know the answer to what you’re requesting a response to and be able to fact-check it. If you don’t do that, then the way you use it is wrong. It’s good for programming where correctness is a small set of rules, or discovering patterns where we are limited, but don’t treat it like a source of knowledge when it constantly crosses its wires.


Sounds like a globe made of hands


Did you mean to paste a source link for that quote?


Holy fuck, an exception to Betteridge’s Law


I think you still have it upside-down? The wrist is the bottom of the tattoo, so while doing pullups it would be inverted. It’s legible while standing, shaking hands, reaching out, etc.


Pretty sure it’s an upside-down forearm; note their hair toward the bottom-left of the photo.
Just a short while ago I was invited to dinner at a friend’s. Wouldn’t you know it – rounded couch. Immediately called CPS and got their kids sent somewhere they can have a chance at a decent upbringing.


Would it be for giving credit it to the Tweeter?


My b, I thought you wanted to know the origin of the meme.
The best way for that to happen would be Obama meeting with Zelensky and Putin, brokering an unmitigated success of a peace deal somehow, receiving the Nobel prize for that specifically, then next time he sees Trump giving him a, “You’re right, Don; that was easy!” with double finger guns