I generally agree with most of what you said, I’m not super familiar with anarcho-syndicalism
But I am trying to have a genuine conversation
So reading this I’m like yes, yes, ok, love it
Then you say “furthermore most social ills that exist today…”
I immediately thought, ok but the practical ills that exist today? Is anarchno-syndicatism also against or at least neutral I suppose, world trade? I ask because I had a bilateral lung transplant, and when I consider the level of social support beyond just financial but also that too and access to medical services, this means supplies, well educated doctors, nurses and surgeons, facilities capable of a bilateral lung transplant, medications which are manufactured all over the world, the need is very high, it feels like this particular perspective would leave a person like me high and dry? At what point do we make the call that community support is enough and how do we define community? Those are all very critical questions for someone like me, and many other disabled people. I guess I wonder, although I agreed a lot with your comment is arachno-syndicatism abelist? Could this ideology ever result in successfully running a world class hospital?
What is the Anarcho-Syndicalist view on world trade? While we support local communities we also explicitly dont believe in the concept of borders. Furthermore international syndicates are used under Anarcho-Syndicalism to facilitate trade and cooperation.
Is Anarcho-Syndicalism ablest? Absolutely not, while we talk a lot about workers we belive eveyone has the right to life, freedom, housing, and bread. Even those who cannot work still recive support, those who require additional assistance would be given by mutal aid organizations and community effort.
How does Anarcho-Syndicalism define community? A local collection of workers who look out for eachother through mutal aid
Can Anarcho-Syndicalism build advanced medical infrastructure? Absolutely, if anything medical advancements would be greater. Medical students wouldn’t have to worry about being shackled to crippling debt, insurance companies wouldn’t be able to extort people, no profit incentive and no patents would insure the prices for medical technology remains low, and hospitals would generally speaking recive more funding.
I generally agree with most of what you said, I’m not super familiar with anarcho-syndicalism But I am trying to have a genuine conversation
So reading this I’m like yes, yes, ok, love it
Then you say “furthermore most social ills that exist today…”
I immediately thought, ok but the practical ills that exist today? Is anarchno-syndicatism also against or at least neutral I suppose, world trade? I ask because I had a bilateral lung transplant, and when I consider the level of social support beyond just financial but also that too and access to medical services, this means supplies, well educated doctors, nurses and surgeons, facilities capable of a bilateral lung transplant, medications which are manufactured all over the world, the need is very high, it feels like this particular perspective would leave a person like me high and dry? At what point do we make the call that community support is enough and how do we define community? Those are all very critical questions for someone like me, and many other disabled people. I guess I wonder, although I agreed a lot with your comment is arachno-syndicatism abelist? Could this ideology ever result in successfully running a world class hospital?
I’ll adress all your questions and concerns: