• underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but thought I’d provide a counter argument.

    A group of children are dying of a horrible, deadly disease that can only be cured with the bark from a specific tree. So we go into the forest and chop this tree down to save the children from an excruciating disease.

    A squirrel had built its entire home in that tree. That tree was everything to the squirrel. Now the squirrel has nothing and will suffer because we chopped down its home.

    How do we explain this to the squirrel? Well, we can’t. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain why we needed to destroy its home. The squirrel is physically incapable of understanding.

    Playing devils advocate here, perhaps the reason for the need for human suffering is so beyond our understanding and comprehension that we are just physically incapable of understanding. Maybe we’re just squirrels, and human suffering needs to happen for some greater purpose unbeknownst to us.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m upvoting because I thought this was done good engagement with the premise and you don’t deserve to be downvoted for it.

      But fundamentally, you’ve missed a pretty big step. What if god just…didn’t create a situation where children get diseases that can only be cured with one rare tree?

      Or, more importantly, what about diseases that cannot be cured? What about natural disasters? Yes, some types of natural disasters have gotten more common and worse as a result of human action, but they still happened before climate change, and if anything were more disruptive to people before we had modern building practices.

      We’re talking about a god that is literally capable of anything. It could just wave its hand and delete all disease from existence. It chooses not to.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      We’re talking about the Abrahamic trio, so God is supposed to be all powerful. That means there is nothing beyond his power. There is no “can only” or “can’t” or “incapable” for him. He can have His cure and save the tree too, He doesn’t have to choose. Your example only works if God is limited in some capacity, and has to make trade offs that we can’t understand.

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A parent can easily do their children’s homework. How does that benefit the kids? A passing mark doesn’t mean the kid understands and the lessons don’t get easier.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The “homework” you’re talking about is war, starvation, disease, rape, slavery, and death.

          A parent is supposed to help their children, not torture them to death for a “lesson”.

          • Maeve@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            We did that. It’s our mess to clean up.

            Oh, but I never voted for that politician! Did we do anything besides vote and clicktivism?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Disease? Starvation? Disaster? Let us not pretend like God didn’t create human evil either. For what? For fun? “To teach us a lesson”?

              The all powerful, all knowing God never seems to do anything either in case you haven’t noticed.

              • Maeve@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Btw, Alan Watts addressed some of this in The Book (on the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are). If you can be bothered.

              • Maeve@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                So we’re given the means to solve these tests. When we learn to work together to solve them, rather than “punishing” each other, we get closer to solving them. Disasters happen, whether natural or man-made. We either work together or we don’t. Test time.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  We aren’t given the means to solve every “test” - sometimes people just die in twisted agony because the test is impossible.

                  • Maeve@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    47 minutes ago

                    No it isn’t. We may have to repeat lessons for a few lifetimes though. And everyone dies. We’re not meant to live forever.

                    I was like this for decades. Then I went hunting. When I made peace with myself, I made peace with God. that means it took looking in the mirror, and still does.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        the Abrahamic trio, so God is supposed to be all powerful.

        The funny thing is, the ancient Israelites almost certainly didn’t believe this. It was a more recent invention that’s obviously not supported by the old testament or the talmud.

    • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      IF there was some reason, first of all, God could give us the ability to understand if he wanted to, as he is not supposed to be limited. Second, it would imply someone is getting something from it, God, us, or otherwise, that for some reason, God can’t give in a way that doesn’t involve evil. But again, if he is never limited, that shouldn’t be the case.

      Also, if cancer and other diseases are supposed to exist and kill people for some kind of purpose we don’t understand, why do we have the ability to treat, vaccinate and cure those same diseases? If medicine gets to the point of preventing every ailment, then why does that “oh so important” reason for it existing not matter anymore? It would seem if these things NEED to exist, we shouldn’t be able to prevent them from happening under any circumstances.

      • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Also, if cancer and other diseases are supposed to exist and kill people for some kind of purpose we don’t understand, why do we have the ability to treat, vaccinate and cure those same diseases

        Oh god, now you’ve hit on why some of the sects that we consider cults do what they do. Somehow, wearing clothes, using plows, building structures to provide shelter and warehousing, creating roads that wheeled contraptions (but they don’t have engines!) use, etc., etc., as part of our technological lives isn’t a sin, but using medical advancements is!

    • bramkaandorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That argument lands you in the “we can’t know which religion is true” category, because if we can’t know the plans of god, we also can’t know which god is real.

      So, while it absolves the believer from having to answer the problem of evil, it simultaneously robs them of any certainty about the truth of their religion.

      But only if they think about it.

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They’re all true and all not true. Each culture given the appropriate teachers at the appropriate time for the appropriate lessons. Five is five, until it’s 5.2.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That is an interesting thought experiment in general but I don’t think it really squares with Christian theology and the central role humanity has in it.