• spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is true but that does not answer the question. My opinion is that if you are pro peace you are automatically pro Russia, pro Ukraine or ideally both (I’m talking about the people and culture in it and not their leaders).

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, if peace means another war as soon as putler has recovered - versus defeating the asshole as hard as possible - then it is advantageous to putler. So, arguing for peace at the moment, is arguing for the attackers advantage.

      Of course there will be peace. Once putler is defeated or preferably dead.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh, Putin + Hitler = Putler. Took me a moment.

        It’s okay to be scared. It’s okay to want the war to stop because you’re scared. It’s okay to want peace, but

        arguing for peace at the moment, is arguing for the attackers advantage.

        hits the nail on the head. Putin pulled the war Genie out of it’s bottle and it won’t go back in until his regime is defeated. It’s okay to want peace and to fight for it, but to argue they need to negotiate now is either completely tone deaf or outright advocacy for Putin’s regime.

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It depends on the terms of that peace. If Russia wants peace, they can withdraw to their 1997 treaty borders. They can not be allowed to hold Ukraine land gained through conquest.