• nicman24@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man that is not the point here… The point is that your uni now can send stuff to orbit when 10 years ago it was economically prohibitted. Elon can fuck off but spacex IMO is a net positive to humanity.

    • NaoPb@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The less can be sent into orbit, the better. We have enough trash in orbit as it is. No need to clutter it up any further.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realise that littering close orbit with more shit is just going to turn it into a whirling extraterrestrial claymore for anything trying to leave the planet.

          Everything that goes up there should have a lifespan to come back down.

        • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, low earth orbit (LEO) still has some thin atmosphere that slows things down a tiny bit and makes them deorbit over time. That’s why, for example, the ISS has to reboost to stay up and can chuck garbage bags overboard and not really worry about them. The deorbit time depends on a lot of factors including the mass and surface area. Starlink sats are supposed to passively deorbit in about 5 years.

    • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cube sats were sent to orbit for university projects long before reusable rockets became commercially available