• Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    No, modern sci-fi evolved over time like all the other complex stuff tends to.

    Modern sci-fi is created by every fellow with a strange idea. Who thinks maybe I could get my idea across better if I framed it as a narrative and put it in scientific terms. because science is such a lovely language for talking about strange ideas.

    • EABOD25@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mary Shelley’s Frankentstein is noted to be the future sci-fi story. Mary at the time was dealing with grief of the death of her husband. That’s all I’m saying

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        No she wasn’t. Frankenstein was published in 1818, Percy Shelley died in 1822. She did have multiple stillborn children, the first of which was within the year prior to the initial first draft of the story, plus she blamed herself for the postpartum death of her own mother. Percy helped edit Frankenstein, he wasn’t dead yet.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You know, you’re both right.

      modern sci-fi is indeed a collective thing that has evolved from its roots. The seed that grew into sci-fi was indeed Mary Shelley.

      However, that depends on the term modern meaning something different from sci-fi as a whole, and when you cut off the start point of modern. If you count all science based fiction as modern, then Shelley is the defining origin.