Interesting paraphrase…
An accurate one.
Does this type of rhetoric actually work? It seems patronizing at least.
“Please don’t vote for a candidate who seeks to actively harm me and take my rights away”
“Stop patronizing me!!”
The last time Trump was elected a significant chunk of the white female electorate sided with him. I’d look there before talking about men, especially Black men who seem to be the preferred scapegoat.
Yeah, this gets glossed over a lot, but it was White Women who gave Trump the nod, specifically because the DNC just assumed all white women would be voting for HRC. Meanwhile HRC remains one of the most politically reviled candidates in modern history.
White women benefit from structural racism above all others, with the exception of white MEN.
So who exactly is being lectured here, and why?
It’s easier to talk down to Black men than to hold white women to account.
So many “well akchewalllys” in this thread…
Just because you don’t like the phrasing, or have other grievances, does not negate the message.
If the phrasing alienates people on your side, and is not effective at changing the minds of people on the other side, it kinda negates the message even is the message is correct.
