• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok this line of thinking is pissing me off.

    As of this right now the turn out is 140,144,378 and counting (it will be weeks before the final number).

    If we look at the last 90 or so years we can see that this “sad turnout” is the second highest only behind 2020s 158,481,688.

    • Hazor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      90 years ago the entire US population was less than that 140 million, let alone eligible voters. Percentage of eligible voters would make a better argument than absolute numbers when you’re comparing over time.

      That said, 140m versus 158m is a huge drop. An astonishing drop. The final total could still amount to a >10% reduction in turnout, despite a slight increase in the number of eligible voters. I don’t understand how that could be viewed as not sad, regardless of who you vote for.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ok, a few things. This is also using the percent of eligible voters and shows about the expected turn out if not higher then normal. And more importantly 140 million is not the final number in fact some places have stated “National turnout has been estimated at 64.5 percent this year, with around 158 million ballots counted out of the 245 million eligible voters.”

        I am sorry that this is not the easy target of blame people clearly want it to be.