• halvar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean in the grand scheme of things there are only a handful of types of people, maybe a few hundred and those types repeat over and over. Everyone has their own unique experiences, personal drama and relationships, but their behavior and core traits are shared with probably millions of people throughout history. Thinking you are unique is not a rational belief and if it becomes integral to one’s personality (like it has to millions of people before them) I think they should be mocked, just for the sake of getting their heads straight.

    It’s not that you aren’t allowed to be the most important character of your story, it’s just that you shouldn’t think that’s because you are something that never was before and never will be after.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The way I think about it is that we’re all “snowflakes”. No two people are exactly the same. So while one can correctly claim to be unique that also applies to everyone else. It’s not like everyone else is the same but you’re unique. Also, being unique doesn’t automatically mean someone is better than others - one can also be uniquely bad.

      • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you’ve stumbled on it yourself. If every person is unique and special, nobody can be singled out or given preferential treatment. That would be an impossible task to cater to ~6 billion or what ever we are at now, individually

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The snowflake metaphor really gives us everything we need. Yes each one has a different crystalline pattern but ALL of them will melt at the same temperature. Thinking your uniqueness extends to everything and frees you from all the rules is the problem. Of course, conservatives love rules too much and don’t even recognize when they are setting up rules for how your crystalline pattern is “supposed to be.”

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What if someone IS unique, though? I would consider Socrates unique. He was so determined, stubborn, and self-assured of his belief that he was a clueless fool that he was willing to die for it. What if someone is a once-a-generation brilliant mind or psychological anomaly? What if someone has a schizospectrum disorder and experiences a reality nobody else lives in?

      • halvar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d argue that’s not a unique person, but a unique skill of an ordinary person. Interacting with Socrates as a person probably wouldn’t have been extraordinary but experiencing his unique ideas for the time would have.

        • VulKendov@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’d argue that unique skills, experiences, and relationships are what make people unique.