• Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    So – pure curiosity… Which countries could yet still potentially join NATO.

    Switzerland doesn’t join anything ever, so it’s the dark horse. But since everything is done by referendum there, it could change on a dime if the public demanded it.

    Austria literally has it in their constitution that they aren’t allowed – but in theory they could change their constitution (unlikely).

    Moldova has the whole Transnistria incentive – but NATO would be shy about that one, because that could potentially immediately put them in hot conflict. However, suppose they backdoored their way in by creating a union with Romania (not impossible, but complicated).

    Ireland has been neutral forever – but the public support for Ukraine is extremely high. So they might even be possible. Higher than Switzerland anyway ;)

    Bosnia and Herzegovina is sort of a special case where they’re sort of partially engaged already.

    Serbia is extremely unlikely while they continue to be extremely contemptuous of everyone. That’s fine. Although Kosovo is sort of under NATO protection.

    In theory, Georgia or Armenia would be candidates, but Turkey would pooh-pooh Armenia right away, and Georgia has contested territory.

    In order of odds, I wager: Ireland, Moldova (via Romania), Georgia+Ukraine (in that order chronologically).

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m interested in Ireland too, especially in the next few years as the reunification party is resurgent

      • Kentaree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ireland has no chance, people here are extremely pro neutrality to the point there were protests when American Airforce jets refueled here. It’s not a case of alignment, it’s that nobody wants to get involved in any sort of conflict.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          That was a very long time ago unless I’ve missed something more recent? (Genuine question) Personally think it’s time to re-examine our neutrality

          It feels wrong not to support Ukraine militarily.

          • taanegl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re all very neutral, until it comes to throwing an Englishman in the sea - LAI-DEE-DAI-DEE-DEE!!!

            • khannie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Hi-dilly-hi…hi-dilly-ho…over the side of the boat you go!

              Nah we’re all friendly now for the most part. Sporting events excluded naturally where fervent, screaming nationalism from the Irish comes in and the English wonder why we are so angry at them. :D

          • Kentaree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            There was a lot of backlash in the last few months when Leo Varadkar attended a defense conference which was mostly NATO members. He was forced to state that Ireland will not join any military alliance whatsoever. I do agree that it feels wrong to not support countries that realistically we’re aligned with but the Irish military is in such a state that if we tried I’d expect Ukraine to actually donate equipment to us instead

        • fidodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          A reunified Ireland could benefit from being in NATO in case England loses their God damn minds and tried to take them back at some point in the future, but I guess those days are over.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, those days are gone thankfully. Also it would be a mistake of epic proportions to try and subjugate the Irish one last time tbh. Epic proportions.

          • bumphot@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            Don’t fearmonger people just so they can join some wars in the middle east for oil companies. They are under no threat and have only to lose.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          To be fair, Ireland doesn’t have the resources or population to be involved in a continental conflict in a impactful way. Getting involved in a war you might not win and might result in the end of your small nation isn’t normally a good idea.

          I don’t believe nato could lose a war with Russia, but I don’t blame Ireland for not wanting to risk it

          • fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            If Russia somehow won a war against NATO and took over all the European NATO countries, which is the vast majority of Europe, what would prevent them from just taking over the leftover bits at that point?

            • khannie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah neutrality is worthless at that point. Sure Hitler wasn’t going to stop with the UK. We were definitely next.

              The main advantage it has given us has been as a trusted UN peacekeeper where the Irish Defence Forces have been seen as a neutral third part to conflict and they have done and continue to do solid work abroad in that regard.

          • mkwt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Doesn’t Ireland already have defensive pact status with a bunch of NATO members through the EU? If your fellow EU states are being attacked, can you really stay out?

    • mellowheat@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was surprised to learn Ireland is not in Nato. They should obviously join asap.

          • GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Most member states have been in support of Israel. Most egregious being US and Germany, but France is ranking high. Supporting Israel is quite zionist in my opinion

          • bumphot@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes. Israel fully depends on US for weapons and finances. Just like NATO. So naturally US government uses both for the same purpose of controlling oil in the middle east.

          • GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The Irish express solidarity on a regular basis. The anticolonial struggle against the English has made them way closer to Palestinians and other colonized peoples than the rest of Europe.

          • bumphot@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            8 months ago

            US has authority in Israel and NATO, so they can make both of them fight in these wars that benefit their oil companies. So NATO and Israel are part of the same miltiary force, only run by different puppet governments.

    • Zanshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Basically any country that was a previous Russian/Soviet satellite and are not interested in being one anymore.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Personally, I see no reason why ever nation couldn’t join NATO at some point.

      I expect “clever” dipshits to be like “NORTH ATLANTIC”, though.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nothing clever needs to be invoked. It’s baked into the text of the treaty. Article 5 is what’s invoked to bring the whole alliance together to defend against an attack on any one member. However, Article 6 limits Article 5 to attacks within Europe, North America, Turkey, and islands in the Atlantic north of the Tropic of Cancer. Strictly speaking, even an attack on Hawaii wouldn’t invoke it.

        I guess countries outside that area could join, but without a change to the treaty, the key clause in the whole thing wouldn’t apply to them.

        • harderian729@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          We got one!

          but without a change to the treaty

          If only there was some way to address this. I guess we should just start a new alliance if we ever want to accept people outside of the North Atlantic.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Changing that treaty is not going to be easy. There are a lot of parties involved.

            Edit: as to your second sentence, there are some thoughts about making a NATO-equivalent for the Pacific.

      • bumphot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe they don’t want to die in middle east for US oil companies.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          8 months ago

          You got downvoted but you’re not wrong. NATO is getting good PR at the moment because of Ukraine, but the invasion of Iraq and Libya are examples of how god-awful NATO is. Iraq was invaded out of trumped up accusations but the real reason is gaining access to Iraqi oil. I remember it was France and UK who were antsy to invade Libya while US refused initially but eventually caved in. Look at the long term implications of such invasions. ISIS sprung up, and Libya is in a civil war causing thousands of refugees which Europe absorbed.

          NATO is getting good image at the moment because of recency bias

      • GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Never in a million years would Switzerland condemn Israel. The state loves Israel. Maybe a strongly worder “please don’t kill children in hospitals” was said, but no measures whatsoever were taken

    • bumphot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      A lot of countries from your list are already very close with NATO, they have NATO offices in their top military command and do most of the military exceraises with NATO. NATO also has a lot of officers of these countries on their paycheck, even some biggest presidentail candidates in these countries are NATO generals.

      NATO has a huge control over the netural governments, only reason they don’t join is because of their populations that don’t like NATO countries invading middle east for oil. Mostly in the Balkans that is the case and some of the countries that joined, they did it without referendums against the will of their people. There is a big sentiment of NATO looking imperialistic and treating middle east and the balkans as colonies. Bosnia for example, doesn’t even have real independence, high representitve placed by the west, from the UN can veto anything that is not in their interest. “So far, all of the High Representatives named have been from European Union countries, and their principal deputies have typically been from the United States”