Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前Statsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1786arrow-down117
arrow-up1769arrow-down1imageStatsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前message-square66fedilink
minus-squareAzzy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前If an anthropologist found a 2-million year old intact foot, I think they’d call it a skeleton, sure.
minus-squareknorke3@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前i somehow have a feeling that they’d call that a partial skeleton (aka. less than one)
minus-squareAzzy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前ehh, partial skeleton, skeleton, what’s the difference? a few missing bones never hurt anybody! /s
If an anthropologist found a 2-million year old intact foot, I think they’d call it a skeleton, sure.
i somehow have a feeling that they’d call that a partial skeleton (aka. less than one)
ehh, partial skeleton, skeleton, what’s the difference? a few missing bones never hurt anybody! /s